Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pranav Sharma
4 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri
12 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Filippo Annino
24 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yunjin Bai
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri
4 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yunjin Bai
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yunjin Bai
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement