This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Yunjin Bai†1,
- Yin Tang†1,
- Lan Deng1,
- Xiaoming Wang1,
- Yubo Yang1,
- Jia Wang1 and
- Ping Han1Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 April 2016
Accepted: 28 August 2017
Published: 31 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pranav Sharma|
|4 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri|
|12 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filippo Annino|
|24 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Yunjin Bai|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri|
|4 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yunjin Bai|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yunjin Bai|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|31 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.