Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Resource utilization and costs associated with the addition of an antimuscarinic in patients treated with an alpha-blocker for the treatment of urinary symptoms linked to benign prostatic hyperplasia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nyirády Péter
6 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anastasios Athanasopoulos
6 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antoni Sicras-Mainar
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nyirády Péter
13 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anastasios Athanasopoulos
31 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antoni Sicras-Mainar
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
12 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0275-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement