Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics

From: Upper urinary tract stone disease in patients with poor performance status: active stone removal or conservative management?

 

Total

Management

p value (surgical treatment vs. conservative management)

Surgical treatment

Conservative management

No. patients (%)

74

52 (70.3)

22 (29.7)

 

Age, years

82 (36–98)

76 (36–92)

86 (68–98)

<0.01

Female, n (%)

51 (68.9)

33 (63.5)

18 (81.8)

0.17

ECOG PS, n (%)

19 (25.7)

16 (30.8)

3 (13.6)

0.15

 3

55 (74.3)

36 (69.2)

19 (86.4)

 

 4

    

Charlson comorbidity index

2 (0–8)

2 (0–6)

2 (0–8)

0.82

Serum creainine on admission, mg/dL

1.01 (0.33–5.49)

0.89 (0.44–5.49)

1.26 (0.33–3.83)

0.28

History of urinary calculi, n (%)

20 (27.0)

16 (30.8)

4 (18.2)

0.39

Coexisting acute pyelonephritis, n (%)

61 (82.4)

40 (76.9)

21 (95.5)

0.09

Urinary drainage

61 (82.4)

43 (82.7)

18 (81.8)

1.00

Bilateral stone, n (%)

7 (9.5)

7 (13.5)

0 (0.0)

0.09

Stone position, n (%)

    

 Kidney

17 (23.0)

14 (26.9)

3 (13.6)

 

 Ureter

44 (59.5)

28 (53.9)

16 (72.7)

 

 Kidney and ureter

13 (17.6)

10 (19.2)

3 (13.6)

 

Stone size, mm

11.5 (2–53)

12 (2–53)

10.5 (4–35)

0.82

Multiple stones, n (%)

41 (55.4)

28 (53.9)

13 (59.1)

0.79

  1. Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, PS performance status
  2. Continuous variables are shown in “median (range)” form