This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 11 July 2017
Accepted: 30 October 2017
Published: 13 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giacomo Maria Pirola|
|14 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael O'Callaghan|
|7 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yang Xun|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giacomo Maria Pirola|
|7 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yang Xun|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|13 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.