Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis

BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:102

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2

Received: 11 July 2017

Accepted: 30 October 2017

Published: 13 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giacomo Maria Pirola
14 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael O'Callaghan
7 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yang Xun
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giacomo Maria Pirola
7 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yang Xun
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
30 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
(2)
Reproductive medicine center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Advertisement