Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: New steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the extraperitoneal approach: a propensity-score matched comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in Japanese patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanna Cattarino
13 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Satoshi Kurokawa
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anastasios Asimakopoulos
31 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Satoshi Kurokawa
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Satoshi Kurokawa
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0298-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement