Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ preoperative clinical characteristics by surgical procedures

From: New steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the extraperitoneal approach: a propensity-score matched comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in Japanese patients

Variables

EP approach

TP approach

p-Value

Patients (n)

190

190

 

Follow-up (months)

27.3 ± 13.8 (4–52)

27.8 ± 154.3 (4–52)

0.78

Age (years)

69.4 ± 6.0 (51–82)

69.3 ± 4.7 (51–79)

0.70

Height (cm)

165.2 ± 6.1 (143.6–186.0)

165.4 ± 5.3 (152.5–183.2)

0.70

Weight (kg)

63.7 ± 9.3 (34.8–103.0)

63.6 ± 9.4 (38.0–122.0)

0.89

BMI (kg/m2)

23.3 ± 3.0 (16.9–34.5)

23.2 ± 2.9 (15.8–36.3)

0.73

PSA (ng/mL)

10.7 ± 11.6 (2.2–84.4)

10.8 ± 10.4 (2.3–73.1)

0.24

Biopsy Gleason score (%)

  

0.12

 2–6

36 (19.0)

44 (23.2)

 

 7

100 (52.6)

80 (42.1)

 

 8–10

54 (28.4)

66 (34.7)

 

Clinical stage (%)

  

0.15

 T1

41 (21.6)

49 (25.8)

 

 T2

142 (74.7)

126 (66.3)

 

 T3

7 (3.7)

15 (7.9)

 

Previous abdominal surgery (%)

62 (32.3)

65 (35.4)

0.91

  1. EP extraperitoneal, TP transperitoneal, BMI body mass index, PSA prostate-specific antigen