Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Patients’ preoperative clinical characteristics by surgical procedures

From: New steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the extraperitoneal approach: a propensity-score matched comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in Japanese patients

Variables EP approach TP approach p-Value
Patients (n) 190 190  
Follow-up (months) 27.3 ± 13.8 (4–52) 27.8 ± 154.3 (4–52) 0.78
Age (years) 69.4 ± 6.0 (51–82) 69.3 ± 4.7 (51–79) 0.70
Height (cm) 165.2 ± 6.1 (143.6–186.0) 165.4 ± 5.3 (152.5–183.2) 0.70
Weight (kg) 63.7 ± 9.3 (34.8–103.0) 63.6 ± 9.4 (38.0–122.0) 0.89
BMI (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 3.0 (16.9–34.5) 23.2 ± 2.9 (15.8–36.3) 0.73
PSA (ng/mL) 10.7 ± 11.6 (2.2–84.4) 10.8 ± 10.4 (2.3–73.1) 0.24
Biopsy Gleason score (%)    0.12
 2–6 36 (19.0) 44 (23.2)  
 7 100 (52.6) 80 (42.1)  
 8–10 54 (28.4) 66 (34.7)  
Clinical stage (%)    0.15
 T1 41 (21.6) 49 (25.8)  
 T2 142 (74.7) 126 (66.3)  
 T3 7 (3.7) 15 (7.9)  
Previous abdominal surgery (%) 62 (32.3) 65 (35.4) 0.91
  1. EP extraperitoneal, TP transperitoneal, BMI body mass index, PSA prostate-specific antigen