Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of individual study

From: Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia

Study

Allocation sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Loss to follow-up

Calculation of sample size

Statistical analysis

Level of quality

ITT analysis

Hong et al. (2010) [20]

A

A

B

3

Yes

Mann-Whitney U-test; Chi-square test

A

No

Joo et al. (2012) [21]

A

A

B

unmentioned

Yes

Student’s t-test; Pearson’s x2-test

A

No

Roehrborn et al. (2014) [22]

A

A

B

unmentioned

Yes

Mann-Whitney U-test; Chi-square test; T-tests

A

Yes

Roehrborn et al. (2015) [23]

A

A

B

16

Yes

T-tests

A

Yes

Choi et al. (2016) [24]

A

A

B

17

No

Mann-Whitney U-test

A

No

  1. A, almost all quality criteria met: low risk of bias, B, one or more quality criteria met:moderate risk of bias; C, one or more criteria not met: high risk of bias; ITT, intention-to-treat