Skip to main content

Table 2 Detection rate of all prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer

From: Three-dimensional greyscale transrectal ultrasound-guidance and biopsy core preembedding for detection of prostate cancer: Dutch clinical cohort study

Whole group

Detection rate of PCa

 Biopsy cohort:

n/N (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

aORa (95% CI)

 Total

568/1618 (35.1%)

 3D TRUS

183/469 (39.0%)

1.27 (1.02–1.59)

1.33 (1.03–1.72)

 2D TRUS

385/1149 (33.5%)

Reference

Reference

Detection rate of clinically significant PCa

 

n/N (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

aORa (95% CI)

 Total

335/1618 (20.7%)

 3D TRUS

117/469 (24.9%)

1.42 (1.10–1.83)

1.47 (1.09–1.98)

 2D TRUS

218/1149 (19.0%)

Reference

Reference

Biopsy naive group

 Detection rate of PCa

 

n/N (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

aORb (95% CI)

  Total

466/1238 (37.6%)

  3D TRUS

151/375 (40.3%)

1.17 (0.92–1.50)

1.20 (0.90–1.60)

  2D TRUS

315/863 (36.5%)

Reference

Reference

 Detection rate of clinically significant PCa

 

n/N (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

aORb (95% CI)

  Total

295/1238 (23.8%)

  3D TRUS

105/375 (28.0%)

1.38 (1.04–1.82)

1.41 (1.02–1.96)

  2D TRUS

190/863 (22.0%)

Reference

Reference

Prior negative group

 Detection rate of PCa

 

n/N (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

aORc (95% CI)

  Total

102/380 (26.8%)

  3D TRUS

32/94 (34.0%)

1.59 (0.96–2.64)

1.78 (1.04–3.04)

  2D TRUS

70/286 (24.5%)

Reference

Reference

 Detection rate of clinically significant PCa

 

n/N (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

aORd (95% CI)

  Total

40/380 (10.5%)

  3D TRUS

12/94 (12.8%)

1.35 (0.66–2.77)

–

  2D TRUS

28/286 (9.8%)

Reference

Reference

  1. aadjusted Odds Ratio: adjusted for age, DRE, prostate volume and physician (PSA and Type of biopsy session resulted in < 10% change in β)
  2. b adjusted Odds Ratio: adjusted for age, DRE and prostate volume and physician (PSA resulted in < 10% change in the β)
  3. c adjusted Odds Ratio: adjusted for age and Log (prostate volume), (age, PSA, DRE and physician resulted in < 10% change in the β)
  4. d the number of events per variable are too low to be analyzed in multivariable logistic regression analysis