Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of survival benefits of nephron-sparing intervention or active surveillance for patients with localized renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Mar 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Majid Mirzazadeh
8 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Angela Cerruto
26 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Runqi GUO
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Runqi GUO
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
5 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12894-019-0503-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement