Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis of CSS and OS by quality of the study, publication year, patient sample, number or type of intervention, and tumor size

From: Comparison of survival benefits of nephron-sparing intervention or active surveillance for patients with localized renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroup/co-variant

Coefficient

s.e.

P value

HR (95%CI); P value

CSS

 Quality

− 0.227

0.1580

0.195

 

 Publication year

0.598

0.2929

0.096

 

   ≤ 2015

   

0.44 (0.31–0.64); < 0.001

   > 2015

   

0.76 (0.65–0.89); 0.03

Patient sample

−0.688

0.2539

0.030

 

  Cancer registry or single center

   

0.78 (0.63–0.96); 0.02

  Population based

   

0.39 (0.26–0.60); < 0.001

 Type of intervention

−0.014

0.2628

0.958

 

  PN

   

0.67 (0.49–0.90); 0.008

  TA

   

0.68 (0.52–0.89); 0.005

 Tumor size

−0.567

0.2342

0.046

 

  T1a

   

0.68 (0.56–0.82); < 0.001

  Not only T1a

   

0.70 (0.36–1.38); 0.31

OS

 Quality

−0.446

0.1986

0.066

 

 Publication year

0.560

0.3845

0.196

 

   ≤ 2015

   

0.39 (0.33–0.46); < 0.001

   > 2015

   

0.93 (0.65–1.34); 0.70

 Patient sample

−0.658

0.4973

0.234

 

  Cancer registry or single center

   

0.68 (0.53–0.88); 0.004

  Population based

   

0.36 (0.30–0.44); < 0.001

 Intervention

0.625

0.2489

0.049

 

  PN

   

0.40 (0.34–0.47); < 0.001

  TA

   

1.05 (0.62–1.80); 0.85

 Tumor size

−0.681

0.3091

0.070

 

  T1a

   

0.43 (0.36–0.51); < 0.001

  Not only T1a

   

0.58 (0.42–0.82); 0.002

  1. CI confidence interval, CSS cancer-specific survival, OS overall survival, PN partial nephrectomy, TA thermal ablation