Skip to main content

Table 2 study quality according to the Downs and Black instrument for success and complications

From: Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction – a systematic review and network meta-analysis

 

Baldwin et al. [25]

Bernie et al. [26]

Bird et al. [27]

Brooks et al. [28]

Calvert et al. [29]

Chen et al. [30]

Danuser et al. [31]

Desai et al. [14]

Fahad [32]

Garcia-Galisteo et al. [33]

Han et al. [22]

Hanske et al. [20]

Hemal et al. [34]

Klingler et al. [35]

Link et al. [36]

Lucas et al. [16]

Memon et al. [37]

Mohammed [38]

Olweny et al. [39]

Pahwa et al. [40]

Rivas et al. [15]

Simforoosh et al. [41]

Umari et al. [42]

Wang et al. [43]

Weise and Winfield [44]

Yanke et al. [21]

Success

 Hypothesis/aim/objective clearly described

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

 Main outcomes in Introduction or Methods

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

NA

0

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Patient characteristics clearly described

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

NA

1

1

NA

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

 Interventions of interest clearly described

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

NA

1

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

 Principal confounders clearly described

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

1

2

 Main findings clearly described

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

0

0

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Estimates of random variability provided for main outcomes

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

NA

1

1

NA

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

 All adverse events of intervention reported

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

NA

1

1

NA

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

 Characteristics of patients lost to follow-up described

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

 Probability values reported for main outcomes

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

 Subjects asked to participate were representative of source population

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

NA

1

1

NA

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

 Subjects prepared to participate were representative of source population

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

NA

1

1

NA

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Location and delivery of study treatment was representative of source population

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Study participants blinded to treatment

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Blinded outcome assessment

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Any data dredging clearly described

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

 Analyses adjust for differing lengths of follow-up

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 Appropriate statistical tests performed

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

NA

0

0

NA

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

 Compliance with interventions was reliable

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Outcome measures were reliable and valid

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

NA

0

0

NA

1

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

 All participants recruited from the same source population

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

 All participants recruited over the same time period

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

NA

0

1

NA

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

 Participants randomized to treatment(s)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Allocation of treatment concealed from investigators and participants

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

 Adequate adjustment for confounding

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 Losses to follow-up taken into account

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

NA

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 Study power

2

1

5

3

4

5

4

2

2

3

3

NA

4

3

NA

5

4

3

2

4

4

4

3

5

3

5

Sum

12

6

19

12

13

16

9

9

11

14

14

NA

14

15

NA

23

16

13

15

13

20

13

17

19

17

25

Complications

 Hypothesis/aim/objective clearly described

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

 Main outcomes in Introduction or Methods

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Patient characteristics clearly described

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

NA

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

 Interventions of interest clearly described

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

NA

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

 Principal confounders clearly described

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

1

1

1

NA

0

0

1

0

1

0

1

2

 Main findings clearly described

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Estimates of random variability provided for main outcomes

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

NA

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

 All adverse events of intervention reported

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

NA

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

 Characteristics of patients lost to follow-up described

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

NA

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

 Probability values reported for main outcomes

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

 Subjects asked to participate were representative of source population

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

 Subjects prepared to participate were representative of source population

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Location and delivery of study treatment was representative of source population

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Study participants blinded to treatment

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Blinded outcome assessment

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Any data dredging clearly described

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

NA

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

 Analyses adjust for differing lengths of follow-up

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 Appropriate statistical tests performed

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

NA

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

 Compliance with interventions was reliable

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 Outcome measures were reliable and valid

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

NA

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

 All participants recruited from the same source population

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

 All participants recruited over the same time period

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

NA

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

 Participants randomized to treatment(s)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Allocation of treatment concealed from investigators and participants

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

 Adequate adjustment for confounding

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 Losses to follow-up taken into account

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 Study power

2

1

5

3

4

5

4

2

2

3

3

5

4

3

1

5

4

NA

2

4

4

4

3

5

3

5

Sum

12

6

19

12

13

16

9

9

11

14

14

23

14

15

12

23

16

NA

15

13

20

13

17

19

17

25

  1. NA not applicable