Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes (n = 70)

From: Significant impact of three-dimensional volumetry of perinephric fat on the console time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Sex (%)

 Male

41 (58.6)

 Female

29 (41.4)

Age (years), median (range)

63 (18–85)

Body mass index (kg/m2), median (range)

23.90 (17.0–31.8)

Mayo adhesive probability score, median (range)

0 (0–4)

Perinephric fat volume (cm3), median (range)

166.05 (22.1–1399.3)

Diabetes mellitus (%)

17 (24.3)

Hypertension (%)

29 (41.4)

Preoperative chronic kidney disease (%)

12 (17.1)

Tumor side (%)

 Right

38 (54.3)

 Left

32 (45.7)

Hilar tumor (%)

15 (21.4)

Tumor size (mm), median (range)

23 (5–57)

R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, median (range)

7 (4–10)

Surgical approach (%)

 Transperitoneal

53 (75.7)

 Retroperitoneal

17 (24.3)

Operative time (min), median (range)

167.5 (103–248)

Console time (min), median (range)

98.0 (60–194)

Estimated blood loss (ml), median (range)

50 (0–620)

Warm ischemia time (min), median (range)

12 (6–21)

Histological subtype (%)

 Clear cell renal cell carcinoma

46 (65.7)

 Other malignant tumor

12 (17.1)

 Angiomyolipoma

7 (10.0)

 Other benign tumor

5 (7.1)

Positive surgical margins (%)

1 (1.4)

Major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3 or 4) (%)

0 (0)

Achievement of trifecta outcomes (%)

69 (98.6)

Achievement of MIC score system outcomes (%)

64 (91.4)

  1. MIC, margin, ischemia and complications