Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical and surgical data between younger (< 65 years) and elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with small renal masses

From: Small renal masses in Latin-American population: characteristics and prognostic factors for survival, recurrence and metastasis – a multi-institutional study from LARCG database

 

<  65 years (n = 949)

≥ 65 years (n = 574)

p Value *

Gender

Male n (%)

644 (68.1)

378 (66.3)

0.496

Female n (%)

301 (31.9)

192 (33.7)

Comorbidities n (%)

Yes

552 (61.3)

387 (72.6)

<  0.001

No

349 (38.7)

146 (27.4)

Hypertension n (%)

115 (18.0)

128 (37.8)

<  0.001

Obesity n (%)

Yes

229 (24.9)

131 (23.6)

0.634

No

691 (75.1)

423 (76.4)

Smoking n (%)

Yes

339 (35.7)

190 (33.1)

0.324

No

610 (64.3)

384 (66.9)

Symptomatic at presentation n (%)

Yes

442 (46.6)

260 (45.3)

0.666

No

507 (53.4)

314 (54.7)

Serum Creatinine - mg/dL

Baseline - Mean (SD)

1.04 (0.81)

1.17 (0.92)

0.045

Median (Q1 – Q3)

0.96 (0.83–1.1)

1.0 (0.83–1.2)

 

Post-operative - Mean (SD)

1.20 (0.79)

1.35 (1.22)

0.143

Median (Q1 – Q3)

1.1 (0.9–1.33)

1.2 (1.01–1.41)

 

Tumor size

≤ 3 cm n (%)

487 (62.3)

255 (55.6)

0.023

> 3 cm n (%)

295 (37.7)

204 (44.4)

Surgical treatment

   

Partial Nephrectomy n (%)

602 (69.7)

295 (59.7)

<  0.001

Radical Nephrectomy n (%)

262 (30.3)

199 (40.3)

Histologic subtype

Clear cell n (%)

401 (64.8)

250 (64.3)

0.921

Non-clear cell n (%)

218 (35.2)

139 (35.7)

Nuclear grade n (%)

Low grade

224 (23.6)

166 (28.9)

0.025

High grade

725 (76.4)

408 (71.1)

Extracapsular extension n (%)

Yes

81 (10.9)

60 (14.0)

0.140

No

661 (89.1)

368 (86.0)

ECOG

0–1 n (%)

912 (96.1)

543 (94.6)

0.212

≥ 2 n (%)

37 (3.9)

31 (5.4)

Karnofsky

≤ 80 n (%)

73 (7.7)

69 (12.0)

0.006

>  80 n (%)

876 (92.3)

505 (88.0)

ASA classification

1–2 n (%)

822 (86.6)

421 (73.3)

<  0.001

≥ 3 n (%)

127 (13.4)

153 (26.7)

  1. * p-Value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test were used in categorical variables when appropriate. Student’s t-test was used in continuous variables