Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristic of the included studies

From: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety

Reference, year

Nation

primary site

Study design

Surgical technique

Sample size

Age (year)

Sex

(M/F)

Stone burden

Stone side

Meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD

Medianā€‰Ā±ā€‰range

(Meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD)

Medianā€‰Ā±ā€‰range

(left / right)

Aboutaleb, 2012 [9]

Kuwait

Lower calyx

CS

PCNL

19

45.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.30

ā€“

14/5

17.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.30

ā€“

ND

fURL

13

47.20ā€‰Ā±ā€‰15.20

ā€“

7/6

14.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.20

ā€“

ND

Armagan, 2015 [10]

Turkey

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

68

43.60ā€‰Ā±ā€‰18.90

ā€“

35/33

13.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.20

ā€“

ND

fURL

59

49.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰15.30

ā€“

36/23

14.40ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.10

ā€“

ND

Bozkur, 2011 [11]

Turkey

Lower calyx

CS

PCNL

42

47.40ā€‰Ā±ā€‰15.50

ā€“

25/17

1.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.12

ā€“

20/22

fURL

37

41.20ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.60

ā€“

21/16

1.65ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.69

ā€“

19/18

Chung, 2008 [12]

America

Kidney

CS

PCNL

15

ā€“

58.00a

40/60

ā€“

1.80 (1.0ā€“2.0)

60/40

fURL

12

ā€“

58.50a

58/42

ā€“

1.25 (1.0ā€“1.9)

58/42

Ferroud, 2011 [13]

French

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

101

51.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰16.10

ā€“

80/21

8.90ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.70

ā€“

ND

fURL

43

49.20ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.80

ā€“

28/15

8.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.20

ā€“

ND

Gu, 2013 [14]

China

Upper ureter

RCT

mPCNL

30

42.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.10

ā€“

17/13

17.27a

ā€“

16/14

fURL

29

44.22ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.00

ā€“

18/11

16.23a

ā€“

12/17

Hu, 2016 [15]

China

ureter

CS

mPCNL

104

65.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.90

ā€“

56/48

15.80Ā Ā±ā€‰3.40

ā€“

53/51

fURL

80

65.10ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.20

ā€“

45/35

15.80Ā Ā±ā€‰3.40

ā€“

47/33

Kirac, 2013 [16]

Turkey

Lower calyx

CS

mPCNL

37

41.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.30

ā€“

25/12

10.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.20

ā€“

16/22

fURL

36

37.80ā€‰Ā±ā€‰8.70

ā€“

22/14

10.20ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.90

ā€“

14/22

Kruck, 2013 [17]

Germany

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

172

53.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.80

ā€“

109/63

12.60ā€‰Ā±ā€‰9.50

ā€“

ND

fURL

108

50.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰16.70

ā€“

69/39

6.80ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.90

ā€“

ND

Kumar, 2015 [18]

India

Lower calyx

RCT

mPCNL

41

33.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.60

ā€“

20/21

13.30a

ā€“

22/19

fURL

43

33.40ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.40

ā€“

20/23

13.10a

ā€“

22/21

Lee, 2015 [6]

Korea

Kidney

RCT

mPCNL

35

59.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.30

ā€“

28/7

39.10a

ā€“

21/14

fURL

33

55.80ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.20

ā€“

28/5

28.90a

ā€“

23/10

Ozgor, 2016 [19]

Turkey

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

56

51.40ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.30

ā€“

25/31

19.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.90

ā€“

25/31

fURL

56

54.20ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.60

ā€“

22/34

18.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.20

ā€“

37/19

Ozgor, 2018 [20]

Turkey

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

58

66.90ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.90

ā€“

28/30

20.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.60

ā€“

ND

fURL

60

67.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.70

ā€“

33/27

19.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.50

ā€“

ND

Pan, 2013 [21]

China

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

59

49.37ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.20

ā€“

36/20

22.37ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.70

ā€“

23/36

fURL

56

49.32ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.70

ā€“

37/22

22.28ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.60

ā€“

30/26

Sabnis, 2012 [22]

India

Kidney

CS

mPCNL

32

44.48ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.36

ā€“

19/13

1.52ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.33

ā€“

10/22

fURL

32

49.28ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.19

ā€“

25/7

1.42ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.34

ā€“

16/16

Sabnis, 2013 [23]

India

Kidney

RCT

mPCNL

35

38.60ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.60

ā€“

22/13

11.00a

ā€“

16/19

fURL

35

43.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.10

ā€“

24/11

10.40a

ā€“

18/17

Schoenthaler,2015 [24]

Germany

Kidney

CS

UMP

30

ā€“

54.30 (19ā€“72)

17/13

ā€“

15.10 (10ā€“20)

ND

fURL

30

ā€“

56.30 (18ā€“76)

ND

ā€“

14.40 (10ā€“20)

ND

Wilhelm, 2015 [25]

Germany

Kidney

CS

UMP

25

ā€“

51.56 (15ā€“75)

15/10

ā€“

19.28 (10ā€“35)

ND

fURL

25

ā€“

51.36 (19ā€“77)

19/6

ā€“

19.20 (10ā€“35)

ND

Zhang, 2014 [26]

China

Upper ureter

CS

mPCNL

32

42.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.60

ā€“

24/8

15.60ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.50

ā€“

ND

fURL

44

43.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.00

ā€“

29/15

14.90ā€‰Ā±Ā 2.30

ā€“

ND

  1. RCT randomized controlled trial, CS cohort study, PCNL percutaneous nephrolithotomy, mPCNL minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy, fURL flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, ND not demonstrated
  2. aNo SD or range was demonstrated in primary studies