Skip to main content

Table 2 Compare of clinicopathologic features and mutational profile by the presence of metastasis in clear cell RCC

From: Sharing the initial experience of pan-cancer panel analysis in high-risk renal cell carcinoma in the Korean population

 

Localized

N = 12

Metastatic

N = 8

p-value

Age

61.4 ± 12.7

66.9 ± 8.6

0.303

Sex – male (%)

8 (66.7%)

5 (62.5%)

1.000

BMI (kg/m2)

25.7 ± 4.3

23.8 ± 6.3

0.439

DM

8 (66.7%)

6 (75.0%)

1.000

HTN

5 (41.7%)

3 (37.5%)

1.000

Mass size (cm)

5.8 ± 2.0

8.8 ± 2.4

0.008

Pathologic T stage – N (%)

  

0.071

  < T2

0 (0%)

2 (25.0%)

 

T3

12 (100%)

5 (62.5%)

 

T4

0 (0%)

1 (12.55)

 

Tumor thrombus level– N (%)

  

0.225

Level 0

10 (83.3%)

5 (62.5%)

 

Level 1

1 (8.3%)

3 (37.5%)

 

Level 2

1 (8.3%)

0 (0%)

 

Fuhrman grade

  

0.400‡

3

12 (100%)

4 (87.5%)

 

4

0 (0%)

1 (12.5%)

 

Lymphovascular invasion

2 (16.7%)

4 (50.0%)

0.161‡

Mutation Counts

7.0 ± 3.2

7.1 ± 2.9

0.930

VHL

9 (75.0%)

5 (62.5%)

0.642‡

PBRM1

2 (16.7%)

5 (62.5%)

0.062‡

NOTCH4

4 (33.3%)

1 (12.5%)

0.603‡

KMT2D

1 (8.3%)

1 (12.5%)

1.000‡

NOTCH3

2 (16.7%)

1 (12.5%)

1.000‡

TSC1

3 (25.0%)

1 (12.5%)

0.619

BAP1

5 (41.7%)

2 (25.0%)

0.642‡

BRCA2

2 (16.7%)

0 (0%)

0.495‡

SETD2

0 (0%)

1 (12.5%)

0.400‡

  1. for Pearson Chi-square, ‡ for Fisher’s Exact Test