Skip to main content

Table 1 Summarizes the primary characteristics of the included trials

From: Comparison of effect between dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis fascia in TIP urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Author, year

Study design

Hypospadias type

Total number of patients

Mean age (range) (year)

Follow-up (mo)

Perioperative use of antibiotics

Postoperative complications

Functional and cosmetic outcomes

Babu 2013 [14]

Pro

Distal and midshaft

83

1.06 (0.75–1.6)

12

Intravenous + oral antibiotics

DF: 11 urethrocutaneous fistula, 4 meatal stenosis, 6 skin necrosis, 2 glans dehiscence

TVF: 1 urethrocutaneous fistula, 1 glans dehiscence, 4 meatal stenosis

NA

Basavaraju 2017 [15]

Retro

Distal, midshaft and proximal

83

3.44 (1.6–12)

6–36

Intravenous + oral antibiotics

DF: 11 urethrocutaneous fistula, 1 meatal stenosis, 3 glans dehiscence

TVF: 0

NA

Chatterjee 2004 [16]

Pro

Distal, midshaft and proximal

49

4.6 (1–22)

12–48(mean 24)

No

DF: 3 urethrocutaneous fistula

TVF: 1 wound dehiscence

NA

Dhua 2012 [17]

Pro

Distal, midshaft and proximal

50

3.21 (1–12)

NA

Intravenous + oral antibiotics

DF: 3 urethrocutaneous fistula, 3 skin necrosis

TVF: 1 wound dehiscence

NA

Gajbhiye 2018 [18]

Pro

Distal and midshaft

48

1.75 (1.5–4.33)

6–18

Intravenous + oral antibiotics

DF: 3 urethrocutaneous fistula, 3 skin necrosis

TVF: 1 wound dehiscence

NA

Kurbet 2018 [19]

Pro

Distal, midshaft and proximal

40

4.85 (0.75–18)

 > 6

No

DF: 2 urethrocutaneous fistula, 2 meatal stenosis, 1 urethral stricture

TVF: 2 meatal stenosis, 1 urethral stricture, 1 mild testis torsion

NA

  1. Pro prospective, Retro retrospective, TIP tubularized incised plate, TVF tunica vaginalis fascia, DF dartos fascia, NA not available