Clinical significance and risk factors of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis to predict overall anastomotic urinary leakage (AUL)

Variable	Cutoff	Univariate		Multivariate
Variable	Cutoff	Odds ratio (95%CI)	P value	Odds ratio (95%CI)	P value
Age, years	≥ 68 versus < 68	0.89 (0.52–1.54)	0.78
BMI, kg/m²	≥ 25 versus < 25	2.02 (1.17–3.48)	0.01*	1.80 (1.03–3.12)	0.03*
iPSA, ng/mL	≥ 7.6 versus < 7.6	1.43 (0.82–2.48)	0.22
Diabetes	With versus without	0.19 (0.04–0.80)	0.01*
COPD	With versus without	0.45 (0.10–1.91)	0.42
IHD	With versus without	1.55 (0.53–4.51)	0.34
Abdominal surgery	With versus without	1.04 (0.56–1.92)	0.87
Surgeon volume, cases	≥ 20 versus < 20	0.95 (0.55–1.66)	0.88
	≥ 40 versus < 40	0.84 (0.48–1.49)	0.67
	≥ 100 versus < 100	0.66 (0.27–1.57)	0.44
Nerve sparing	With versus without	0.92 (0.52–1.64)	0.88
Duration of console, min	≥ 184 versus < 184	2.00 (1.13–3.54)	0.01*	1.84 (1.03–3.28)	0.03*
Prostate weight, g	≥ 40 versus < 40	1.80 (0.99–3.27)	0.05	1.69 (0.93–3.09)	0.08
Blood, mL	≥ 230 versus < 230	1.26 (0.73–2.17)	0.41
pGS ≥ 8	≥ versus <	0.86 (0.46–1.58)	0.76
pT3	≥ versus <	0.98 (0.54–1.77)	1.00
PSM	With versus without	0.80 (0.39–1.62)	0.61

BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease; PSA, prostate specific antigen; pGS, pathological Gleason score; PSM, positive surgical margin
Statistical significance is shown as * for P < 0.05

ISSN: 1471-2490