Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison in terms of clinical and stone characteristics

From: Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm

 

Group 1

Group 2

p value

No. patients, n

160

180

 

Age, years, mean (SD)

45.2 (8.8)

46.8 (7.6)

0.083

Gender, n (%)

   

Male

76 (47.5)

88 (48.9)

0.442

Female

84 (52.5)

92 (51.1)

 

BMI, mean (SD)

24.39 (3.02)

24.68 (2.68)

0.39

Side, n (%)

   

Right

68 (42.5)

88 (48.9)

0.142

Left

92 (57.5)

92 (51.1)

 

Stone size, mm, mean (SD)

12.6 (1.42)

12.4 (1.39)

0.898

Calcium oxalate stones, n (%)

136 (85)

157 (87.2)

0.331

CT value, Hu, mean (SD)

718.65 (148.30)

739.11 (109.78)

0.159

  1. URS ureteroscopy, BMI body mass index, CT computed tomography, SFR stone-free rate