Skip to main content

Table 3 Intra-operative complications of URS

From: Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm

Complications

Group 1 (n = 160), n (%)

Group 2 (n = 180), n (%)

p value

Intra-operative complications

109 (68.1)

52 (28.9)

< 0.05

Satava I (Observation)

56 (35.0)

20 (11.1)

< 0.05

Bleeding nearly no effect to URS operation

29 (18.1)

10 (5.6)

< 0.05

Mucosal tears

6 (3.8)

2 (1.1)

0.107

Stones less than 6 mm migration Renal pelvis

21 (13.1)

8 (4.4)

0.004

Satava II (requiring endoscopic retreatment)

52 (32.5)

32 (17.8)

0.001

Mucosal injury (A false intramural route formation)

3 (1.9)

1 (0.6)

0.269

Bleeding making the surgical field invisible

12 (7.5)

4 (2.2)

0.020

Inability to reach stone requiring secondary URS

1 (0.6)

2 (1.1)

0.544

Residual fragments larger than 6 mm

10 (6.3)

9 (5.0)

0.395

Stones larger than 6 mm migration renal pelvis requiring flexible URS

24 (15.0)

15 (8.3)

0.040

Ureteral perforation requiring percutaneous nephrostomy

2 (1.3)

1 (0.6)

0.456

Satava III (requiring open surgery)

1(0.6)

0

0.471

Urethral stricture

0 (0)

0

 

Ureteral avulsion

0 (0)

0

 
  1. URS ureteroscopy, UTI urinary tract infection