Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics

From: A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate

 

Transperineal biopsy (N = 92)

Transrectal biopsy (N = 85)

p

Total number of targets

104

92

 

Age

66 (61–72)

67 (62–73)

0.61

DRE, n (%)

  

0.312

 Negative

65 (70.6%)

62 (72.9%)

 

 Positive

27 (29.3%)

23 (27.0%)

 

Previous biopsy, n (%)

  

0.844

 Biopsy naïve

64 (69.5%)

57 (67.0%)

 

 Repeat biopsy

28 (30.4%)

28 (32.9%)

 

PSA, ng/mL

7.5 (5.30–13.28)

8.04 (5.76–12.12)

0.608

Prostate volume, ml

42.34 (29.93–59.08)

43.4 (30.9–54.9)

0.582

PSAD

0.18 (0.11–0.32)

0.18 (0.12–0.27)

0.729

PI-RAS score, n (%)

  

0.277

 3

19 (18.2%)

13 (14.1%)

 

 4

48 (46.1%)

53 (57.6%)

 

 5

37 (35.5%)

26 (28.2%)

 

Total core number, n

26 (23–28)

20 (16–22)

< 0.001

 Targeted biopsy

6 (4–7)

4 (3–4)

< 0.001

 Systematic biopsy

19 (17–22)

16 (12–18)

< 0.001

Target lesion size, mm

12 (9–19.25)

10.5 (6.75–16)

0.305

Target lesion location, n (%)

   

 Anterior

41 (39.4%)

31 (33.6%)

0.406

 posterior

63 (60.5%)

61 (66.3%)

 
  1. Continuous data were show as median (IQR)
  2. DRE, digital rectal exam; IQR, interquadrant range; PSA, prostate specific antigen; PSAD, prostate specific antigen density; PI-RADS, Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System