Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and preoperative characteristics of the 84 patients included in the comparative analysis stratified by transposition of the left ureter in ileal conduit diversion

From: Is it necessary to perform a retrosigmoid transposition of the left ureter in Bricker Ileal Conduit surgery?

Variable

Total cases

Study group (n = 30)

Control group (n = 54)

p value

Age, [years, mean ± SD]

69.31 ± 9.36

70.84 ± 9.89

68.44 ± 9.03

0.258

Male gender, n (%)

64 (76.20)

26 (86.67)

38 (70.37)

0.158

ECOG performance status, n (%)

   

0.783

 0–1

79 (94.05)

28 (93.33)

51 (94.44)

 

  > 1

5 (5.95)

2 (6.67)

3 (5.56)

 

Diabetes mellitus, n (%)

14 (16.67)

5 (16.67)

9 (16.67)

1.000

BMI, [kg/m2, mean ± SD]

22.77 ± 3.03

22.36 ± 3.04

23.00 ± 3.03

0.359

ASA score, [cases (%)]

   

0.471

  ≤ 2

60 (71.43)

20 (66.67)

40 (74.07)

 

  > 2

24 (28.57)

10 (33.33)

14 (25.93)

 

Previous abdominal surgery, n (%)

19 (22.62)

10 (33.33)

9 (16.67)

0.080

Preoperative hydronephrosis, n (%)

   

0.399

Absent

71 (84.52)

24 (80.00)

47 (87.04)

 

Unilateral

7 (8.33)

3 (10.00)

4 (7.41)

 

Bilateral

6 (7.14)

3 (10.00)

3 (5.56)

 

Clinical tumor stage, n (%)

   

0.609

  ≤ T1

28 (33.33)

8 (26.67)

20 (37.04)

 

 T2

32 (38.10)

13 (43.33)

19 (35.19)

 

 T3-4

24 (28.57)

9 (30.00)

15 (22.22)

 

Preoperative creatinine, [μmol/L, median (range)]

80 (49–143.5)

84 (39–143.5)

78 (44–135)

0.307

  1. ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; BMI = Body mass index; SD = standard deviation