Table 3 Comparison between the three studied groups as regards the follow-up results
From: Concealed penis in pediatric age group: a comparison between three surgical techniques
Variables | Surgical techniques | Test of significance p-e) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A (n = 50) | Group B (n = 50) | Group C (n = 50) | |||||
No | % | No | % | No | % | ||
Skin congestion | MCp = 0.122 | ||||||
Absent | 49 | 98.0 | 45 | 90.0 | 49 | 98.0 | |
Present | 1 | 2.0 | 5 | 10.0 | 1 | 2.0 | |
Skin infection | MCp = 1.0 | ||||||
Present | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
Absent | 50 | 100.0 | 49 | 98.0 | 50 | 100.0 | |
Penile edema | X2 = 34.720 p < 0.001* | ||||||
Yes | 35a | 70.0 | 39a | 78.0 | 38b | 76.0 | |
No | 15a | 30.0 | 11a | 22.0 | 12b | 24.0 | |
Penile re-retraction | X2 = 12.444 p = 0.002* | ||||||
Yes | 3a | 6.0 | 11b | 22.0 | 1a | 2.0 | |
No | 47a | 94.0 | 39b | 78.0 | 49a | 98.0 | |