From: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen
Study | Participants | TP | FP | FN | TN | Sensitivity [CI] | Specificity [CI] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aragona 2005 | 3171 | 1073 | 1695 | 98 | 305 | 0.92 [0.90, 0.93] | 0.15 [0.14, 0.17] |
Beneduce 2007 | 101 | 42 | 31 | 8 | 20 | 0.84 [0.71, 0.93] | 0.39 [0.26, 0.54] |
Ciatto 2004 | 410 | 167 | 171 | 18 | 54 | 0.90 [0.85, 0.94] | 0.24 [0.19, 0.30] |
Espana 1998 | 170 | 53 | 96 | 15 | 6 | 0.78 [0.66, 0.87] | 0.06 [0.02, 0.12] |
Fischer 2005 | 178 | 61 | 76 | 13 | 28 | 0.82 [0.72, 0.90] | 0.27 [0.19, 0.37] |
Hofer 2000 | 184 | 67 | 81 | 7 | 33 | 0.91 [0.81, 0.96] | 0.29 [0.21, 0.38] |
McArdle 2004 | 171 | 93 | 52 | 10 | 16 | 0.90 [0.83, 0.95] | 0.24 [0.14, 0.35] |
Ryden 2007 | 361 | 180 | 146 | 8 | 27 | 0.96 [0.92, 0.98] | 0.16 [0.11, 0.22] |
Unal 2000 | 59 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 19 | 1.00 [0.88, 1.00] | 0.66 [0.46, 0.82] |
Wymenga 2000 | 716 | 253 | 228 | 68 | 15 | 0.79 [0.74, 0.83] | 0.06 [0.03, 0.10] |