Table 5 Results of sexual function
Assessment Tool used (Study) | Study Group (%) | Control Group (%) | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
IIEF-15 | Â | Â | Â |
Romero | 19.39* | 29.56 | Erectile function (14/18 with high confidence) |
| Â | 7.67* | 9.94 | Orgasm (3/18 no orgasm) |
| Â | 7.61* | 8.89 | Sexual desire (6/18 reduced post-op) |
| Â | 6.89* | 12.67 | Intercourse satisfaction (6/18 no intercourse) |
| Â | 6.11* | 8.61 | Overall satisfaction (12/18 reduced satisfaction post-op) |
Windahl | n/a | n/a | 10 had ED, 6 had no intercourse, 1 mild ED, 3 moderate ED. |
Gulino | 21 | 22 | Erectile function before disease vs post-op function at 12 months |
| Â | 13 | 12 | Orgasm " " " " " |
| Â | 8 | 9 | Libido " " " " " |
LiSat-II | Â | Â | Â |
Windahl | 50 | n/a | Proportion satisfied with sex life |
Self made sexual activity | Â | Â | Â |
Windahl | 28.6 | 14.3 | Proportion with reduced activity |
Self made sexual function | Â | Â | Â |
Windahl | 16.7 | 22.2 | Proportion with decreased desire |
ED | Â | Â | Â |
Windahl | 16.7 | 8.3 | Proportion decreased |