Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of individual study

From: The efficacy and safety of silodosin for the treatment of ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Allocation sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Loss to follow-up

Calculation of sample size

Statistical analysis

Level of quality

Jadad Score(5-point)

Itoh Y 2011

B

B

A

6

NO

Student’s t-test

B

3

Tsuzaka Y 2011

B

B

A

10

NO

Student’s t-test

B

3

Guptas S 2013

A

B

A

0

NO

Student’s t-test

A

4

Dell'Atti L 2014

B

A

A

3

YES

Student’s t-test

A

4

Sur RL 2014

A

A

A

6

YES

Wilcoxon test

A

5

Kumar S 2015

A

A

A

6

YES

chi-square test

A

5

  1. A - all quality criteria met (adequate): low risk of bias. B - one or more of the quality criteria only partly met (unclear): moderate risk of bias
  2. C - one or more criteria not met (inadequate or not used): high risk of bias