Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of the associations between MetS and urologic, kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer risk

From: Association of metabolic syndrome and its components with the risk of urologic cancers: a prospective cohort study

Variable

Urologic cancer

Kidney cancer

Prostate cancer

Bladder cancer

HR (95%CI)

P for inter-action

HR (95%CI)

P for Inter-action

HR (95%CI)

P for inter-action

HR (95%CI)

P for inter-action

Age(years)

 

0.102

 

0.182

 

0.678

 

0.511

  < 45

1.98 (0.96–4.08)

 

2.54 (1.07–6.06)

 

-

 

1.63 (0.39–6.91)

 

 45–54

1.48 (1.02–2.16)

 

1.82 (1.13–2.95)

 

1.61 (0.54–4.79)

 

0.87 (0.38–2.01)

 

 55–64

1.13 (0.83–1.55)

 

1.34 (0.77–2.32)

 

1.39 (0.81–2.41)

 

0.97 (0.54–1.73)

 

  ≥ 65

1.15 (0.85–1.56)

 

1.47 (0.67–3.23)

 

1.35 (0.84–2.18)

 

0.81 (0.50–1.32)

 

Ptrend

 < 0.001

 

0.033

 

 < 0.001

 

 < 0.001

 

Gender

 

0.165

 

0.040

   

0.097

 Female

0.77 (0.34–1.77)

 

0.49 (0.16–1.56)

 

-

 

3.44 (0.60–19.65)

 

 Male

1.33 (1.10–1.60)

 

1.96 (1.42–2.71)

 

-

 

0.87 (0.62–1.22)

 

Occupation

 

0.004

 

0.049

 

0.363

 

0.228

 White collar

0.41 (0.19–0.91)

 

0.28 (0.06–1.29)

 

0.87 (0.25–2.99)

 

0.33 (0.07–1.58)

 

 Blue collar

1.40 (1.16–1.69)

 

1.98 (1.44–2.72)

 

1.54 (1.08–2.20)

 

0.98 (0.70–1.38)

 
  1. Compared with the non-MetS group respectively
  2. MetS metabolic syndrome
  3. Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, occupation, education level, income, marital status, salt intake, and physical activity
  4. The interaction terms were age, gender, and occupation with MetS, respectively