Skip to main content

Table 2 The comparison of intraoperative and postoperative indexes among the three groups

From: A retrospective comparison of Sun’s tip-flexible semirigid ureterorenoscopy, super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy applied to treat upper urinary tract calculi

Group

tf-URS group (n = 51)

SMP group (n = 46)

FURS group (n = 55)

F(x2) value

P value

Between-group difference

Operation time (min)

46.5 ± 15.6

106.4 ± 17.0

52.5 ± 16.2

F = 198.831

0.000

P = 0.000#

P = 0.059

P = 0.000§

Single stone crushing success rate*

40(78.4%)

45(97.8%)

43(78.2%)

x2 = 9.198

0.010

P = 0.004#

P = 0.975

P = 0.003§

Hemoglobin drop after surgery (g/L)

4.3 ± 2.1

14.3 ± 5.0

5.0 ± 3.2

F = 115.228

0.000

P = 0.000#

P = 0.322

P = 0.000§

Postoperative hospital stay (d)

2.2 ± 1.1

4.7 ± 3.3

2.3 ± 1.0

F = 23.703

0.000

P = 0.000#

P = 0.769

P = 0.000§

Pain degree (score) 6 h after surgery

2.1 ± 0.8

4.0 ± 1.8

2.3 ± 1.4

F = 26.486

0.000

P = 0.000#

P = 0.472

P = 0.000§

Hospitalization cost (in RMB ×104)

1.1 ± 0.5

2.0 ± 1.1

1.6 ± 0.6

F = 15.271

0.000

P = 0.000#

P = 0.002

P = 0.011§

Stone-free rate at 3 months after surgery

43(84.3%)

44(95.7%)

47(85.5%)

x2 = 3.582

0.167

   
  1. *Single stone crushing success rate refers to the scope’s access to the collecting system followed by exploring and crushing stones successfully
  2. #The difference between tf-URS group and SMP group
  3. The difference between tf-URS group and FURS group
  4. §The difference between SMP group and FURS group