Skip to main content
Download PDF

Arabic version of the SF-Qualiveen: cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of urinary disorder‐specific instruments in patients with multiple sclerosis

BMC Urology volume 24, Article number: 37 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Short Form Qualiveen (SF-Qualiveen) questionnaire assesses the effect of bladder and urinary symptoms on patients’ quality of life (QoL) with urological impairment caused by neurological diseases. There is no validated SF-Qualiveen questionnaire in Arabic, so this study aims to provide a translated and validated version of the SF-Qualiveen questionnaire among Arabic-speaking patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

The English version of the SF-Qualiveen was translated into Arabic using an algorithm for linguistic and cultural adaptation. MS patients completed the SF-Qualiveen, and the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score(NBSS) questionnaire. Psychometric features such as content and construct validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency were analyzed. Construct validity was evaluated by contrasting the SF-Qualiveen with the NBSS questionnaire. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, whereas the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the test-retest reliability.

Results

One hundred and two patients with MS were included in this study. The internal consistency of the total SF-Qualiveen, and the domains “Bother with limitations,” “Fear,” “Feeling,” and “Frequency of limitations” showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of > 0.7). ICC was 0.91 for the total score 0.85 for the Bother with limitations, 0.81 for Fears, 0.86 for Feeling, and 0.81 for Frequency of limitations. The correlation analysis revealed a positive association between the total scores on the NBSS and the domains of the SF-Qualiveen, comprising bother with limitations (r = 0.473, p = 0.027), fears (r = 0.611, p = 0.031), feelings (r = 0.572, p = 0.04), and frequency of limitations (r = 0.514, p = 0.013).

Conclusions

The findings of this validation study revealed that the SF-Qualiveen is a reliable and valid instrument appropriate for Arabic-speaking patients with MS in both research and clinical practice.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Urological dysfunction is common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with prevalence reported as high as 32–97% [1]. This variance is at least partly related to the stage of the progression of the disease. While overactive bladder (OAB) and bladder sphincter dyssynergia (BSD) have been identified as early stage manifestations of MS. OAB refers to a syndrome characterized by urinary urgency, frequency, and sometimes urinary incontinence. BSD, on the other hand, is a condition in which there is a lack of coordination between the contraction of the bladder and relaxation of the urinary sphincter during voiding. These bladder dysfunctions often develop in the early stages of MS, as the disease progresses and affects the neural pathways involved in bladder control. Several studies have demonstrated the prevalence and impact of OAB and BSD in MS patients. A study by de Sèze et al. investigated the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in MS patients and found that OAB was present in 46% of the participants [1]. Another study by C Solaro et al. reported a high prevalence of BSD in MS patients, with approximately 30% of the participants showing signs of sphincter dyssynergia [2]. Lower urinary tract dysfunction symptoms (LUTS) are associated with an important worsening of the quality of life (QoL) in patients with MS [3]. As variations were observed between the perceptions of patients and doctors regarding the effect of neurological conditions like MS, direct assessments of the patient’s suffering and experiences are required to learn about their impression of the disease’s effect on the QoL [4]. The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations on neuro-urology emphasize the importance of quality of life in treating patients’ neuro-urological [5].

Urologists frequently utilize bladder diaries and several self-administered questionnaires to get a more precise and comprehensive record of symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction patients. The EAU advises using a validated instrument to assess the quality of life of LUTS patients [5]. More than thirty validated questionnaires are designed to assess the symptoms of urinary tract dysfunction and their effect on a patient’s QoL. Only a few of these questionnaires were specially designed for patients with LUTS [6]; out of them, the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) [7], the Qualiveen [8], and its short form (SF-Qualiveen) [9] are commonly utilized questionnaires for assessing urinary-specific patients’ QoL with MS.

The NBSS is a questionnaire used to evaluate the symptoms of a neurogenic bladder. It includes 24 questions; the first classifies patients using bladder management methods. The following 22 questions evaluate three domains: voiding, incontinence, and consequences, and the last question addresses the overall QoL [7, 10]. Then, in 2020, Welk et al. developed a short version of NBSS (NBSS-SF) that includes 10 items evaluating the three same domains as the NBSS original version; the NBSS questionnaire is also validated in Arabic [11].

The Qualiveen was initially a French questionnaire [9], translated and validated into English [12], then German [13], Italian [14], Portuguese [15], Spanish [16], and Turkish [17]. The Qualiveen was designed employing expert opinion, interviews with patients, and a literature review. It consists of 30 items in four domains: Bother with limitations, Fears, Feelings, and Frequency of limitations. Later, in 2008, Bonniaud et al. designed a short version of Qualiveen that includes eight questions assessing the four same domains as the Qualiveen version [18]. It is currently available in English [18], German [19], Greek [20] and Polish for MS patients [21]. The aim of our study is to translate, culturally adapt, and validate an Arabic version of the SF-Qualiveen in MS patients to make the SF-Qualiveen suitable for MS patients in both research and clinical practice.

Methods

Setting and recruitment of the patients

Adult MS patients with urinary symptomatology who visited the outpatient neurorehabilitation clinics in the Syrian provinces of Damascus and Latakia between September 2022 and March 2023 were invited for the study (our data was collected from four outpatient clinics, two clinics from each province). These facilities specialize in treating people with diseases or nervous system injuries and providing physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech and swallowing therapy. Each clinic has a unit for addressing defecation and urination problems caused by neurological injuries. The physical rehabilitation sessions are carried out by qualified therapists under the supervision of physiatrists. All subjects were over 18, had multiple sclerosis, and could read and speak Arabic proficiently. Patients who had undergone urologic surgery within the last twelve months, recently experienced a change in their overall state of health, and experienced a change in their neurogenic bladder (NB) or active urinary infection symptoms within the previous thirty days were excluded. The sample size calculations were determined based on the literature’s recommendation of at least ten patients per question [22]. The SF-Qualiveen had eight questions, so we needed a minimum of eighty MS patients.

The Ethical Committee approved this study in the Al Baath University Institutional Review Board Consent Letter – IRB 2,023,196-S, and all procedures were conducted under the ethical principles outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. All our methods were carried out under relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and their legal guardian(s) (illiterate participants). We explained the purpose of the survey to each participant and the way to answer the questionnaire. It was all voluntary; no names were taken, so we provided anonymous data collection.

Translation and validation of the SF-Qualiveen

This study is divided into two stages. The first one involves translating and cross-culturally adapting the SF-Qualiveen into Arabic. The second one involves assessing the Arabic SF-Qualiveen’s validity and reliability.

Stage 1: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

The SF-Qualiveen questionnaire has been translated using Beaton et al.‘s self-reported measurement recommendations [23]. The forward translation of the English version of SF-Qualiveen into Arabic was completed by two professional, independent, native Arabic-speaking sworn translators who did not have any clinical knowledge about the project. Then, a first consensus meeting was followed between the two translators and the principal researcher (FK), whose mother language is Arabic. The consensus form was back-translated from Arabic into English by two certified English translators in Arabic who were unaware of the study’s goal or the original versions of the translated questionnaire. The Arabic and English translators, and the principal researcher concurred during the second consensus meeting that the original and the Arabic version were both understandable and equivalent. The final Arabic version was examined by a bilingual panel comprising of two neurorehabilitation specialists (AG, YR), a specialist in the neurologic bladder (AM), and a urogynecologist (SF). The four staff members revised the Arabic version of the questionnaire to evaluate each instrument item’s semantic, idiomatic, and conceptual equivalence. The questionnaire items were reviewed to ascertain their clinical relevance and acceptability for usage in the specific patient group [21]; after completing the assessment, the Arabic version of the SF-Qualiveen was approved by the staff members, and then it was ready for validation.

Stage 2: validation

Reliability

The psychometric properties of the SF-Qualiveen questionnaire were evaluated under the principles of cross-cultural adaptation [23]. Reliability refers to the level of measurement accuracy [24]. This study evaluated both test-retest and internal consistency reliability [24]. Internal consistency is the degree to which items from the same domain correlate. Cronbach’s alpha measures internal consistency, and a score greater than 0.70 can be considered good [25]. For the test-retest of the SF-Qualiveen, all participants completed the SF-Qualiveen at the outpatient clinic (test) and again two weeks later at home (retest). Patients independently completed the NBSS and SF-Qualiveen questionnaires, while the treating physician clarified the precise aim and content of the questionnaires’ items. During this phase of the study, baseline demographic information was also collected. All the patients were asked to complete both questionnaires within 10–15 days to assess test-retest reliability. The interval between both tests was large enough to lower the likelihood that the patients would forget the questions and short enough to avoid any alters in the patients’ bladder management techniques or symptoms. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the results; an association of more than 0.7 is regarded as strong [25].

Validity

Validity indicates if the findings actually reflect what they are trying to measure [24]. In this study, we investigated the construct and content validity. Construct validity refers to an instrument’s capability to evaluate the underlying concept it is looking for [25].This study determined construct validity by evaluating the correlation between the SF-Qualiveen and the NBSS questionnaires using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Content validity indicates how well an assessment tool covers all relevant items of the construct it aims to measure. It can be assessed by specialists who decide whether the proposed items on the instrument are relevant to the phenomenon to be assessed [25]. Content validity was evaluated through patient interviews; 30 Arabic-speaking MS were asked to evaluate the content validity in face-to-face interviews during September and October 2022, and those patients were not counted from the final sample of our study. All the participants were requested to fill out a questionnaire first. Afterward, the participants were asked to comment on the questions’ content, wording, and language. Furthermore, all the participants were asked if the questions addressed all of their urinary tract problems.

Statistical analysis

The data are shown as percentages when indicating frequency and categorical data, while the mean and standard deviation were employed for continuous data. Cronbach’s alpha was computed to evaluate the SF-Qualiveen’s internal consistency, with a value of 0.7 or higher being acceptable (from 0.00 to 0.49 = unacceptable; from 0.50 to 0.59 = poor; from 0.60 to 0.69 = questionable; from 0.70 to 0.79 = acceptable; from 0.80 to 0.89 = good; and 0.90 to 1.00 = excellent) [26]. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to measure test-retest repeatability. The construct validity of the questionnaire was identified by evaluating the association between SF-Qualiveen and NBSS using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The association’s strength was calculated as follows: (less than 0.10 = negligible; 0.11–0.39 = weak; 0.40–0.69 = moderate;0.70–0.89 = strong; and 0.90–1.00 = very strong correlation [27]. The significance level was fixed at 0.05, and all statistical analyses were computed using SPSS Version 23.0.

Results

One hundred forty-three patients with symptomatic urinary disorders were asked to participate in this validation study. Thirty-one patients did not respond to the participation invitation. Ten individuals were removed for several reasons: one patient changed treatments during the test-retest interval, nine refused to complete the second questionnaire for unclear reasons. Finally, 102 MS patients completed the second questionnaire (retest), an average of 15.1 ± 8.6 days after the initial set of SF-Qualiveen, and were accepted in the ultimate analyses. The characteristics of the participants with LUTS included in the study are shown in Table 1. Most of them were fully ambulatory 73 (71.6%) with relapsing-remitting MS 64 (62.8%), who voided without catheterization 61 (59.8%) but reported both storage and voiding urinary symptoms 61 (59.8%).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics
Full size table

Reliability

Internal consistency

The internal consistency for the overall SF-Qualiveen showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88). The domains “Bother with limitations,” “Fear,” “Feeling,” and “Frequency of limitations” also demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of > 0.7, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Internal consistency − Cronbach’s alpha (n = 102 MS patients)
Full size table

Reproducibility

The overall SF- Qualiveen reproducibility was good, with ICCs of 0.91. The ICC value for every SF-Qualiveen domain was higher than 0.7 (0.85 for the Bother with limitations, 0.81 for Fears, 0.86 for Feeling, and 0.81 for Frequency of limitations.), indicating good reproducibility (Table 3).

Table 3 Reproducibility of SF-Qualiveen
Full size table

Validity

Content validity

Face-to-face interviews with 30 patients with MS were conducted to assess content validity. Most patients agreed that all items were necessary to examine the wide range of bladder problems that patients encounter. The questionnaires were typically accessible, simple to comprehend, and quick to complete for the participating patients, and no changes were required.

Construct validity

The construct validity was assessed using Spearman’s rank test, which compared the SF-Qualiveen questionnaire to the NBSS questionnaire. A significant strong association was observed between the QoL item of the NBSS and the SF-Qualiveen overall score (r = 0.831, p 0.001) and bother with limitations domain of the SF- Qualiveen (r = 0.781, p 0.022). There was a substantial moderate positive association between the overall scores on the NBSS and the domains of the SF- Qualiveen, involving bother with limitations (r = 0.473, p = 0.027), fears (r = 0.611, p = 0.031), feelings (r = 0.572, p = 0.04), and frequency of limitations (r = 0.514, p = 0.013). The majority of the SF-Qualiveen domain demonstrated a moderate association with the QoL and the storage and voiding domains. The results of SF- Qualiveen showed weak correlation scores for the consequences domains of NBSS (Table 4).

Table 4 Correlation between SF-Qualiveen and NBSS scores
Full size table

Discussion

This study validated and culturally adapted the SF-Qualiveen after translating it into Arabic for use among MS patients. The psychometric characteristics presented good statistical results and showed that the Arabic version of the SF-Qualiveen is a consistent, valid, and reliable instrument for use among MS patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. The psychometric properties of the SF-Qualiveen questionnaire enable its use for future research and clinical practice in Arabic countries. The QoL of patients suffering from chronic diseases such as MS is a significant component of healthcare. The symptoms of lower urinary tract problems considerably affect these patients’ quality of life [16]. As a result, employing questionnaires for patients with urinary symptoms is strongly suggested as an essential supplement in LUTS management and shared decision-making with patient-reported outcomes [5, 6]. We decided to validate and translate the SF- Qualiveen since it is practical, simpler to use in clinical practice and research, and less complicated for patients to complete compared to the Qualiveen questionnaire. The length of the questionnaire was mentioned as a limitation in the previous studies, which evaluated the validity of the Qualiveen questionnaire [15, 16].

The SF-Qualiveen was created to facilitate large-scale population surveys by reducing data-gathering time and cost [18]. The validations of the SF-Qualiveen in earlier research tend to be conducted with patient from various centers or patients with various neurological problems [14, 15]. Getting an effective and sufficient number of people with neurogenic disorders to conduct validation is difficult and often impossible. This study tried to validate the SF‐Qualiveen with the involvement of MS patients. The Arabic SF-Qualiveen showed an internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89), similar to the previous validation studies for MS patients (German = 0.85) [19], (Russia = 0.89) [28], and (Polish = 0.86), [21]. The internal consistency of the feelings (0.81) and bother with limitations (0.83) domains was better than the frequency of limitations (0.68) and fears (0.71) domains. A comparable tendency was previously observed by E. S. Philippova et al. for the Russian version (0.79 and 0.93 vs. 0.43 and 0.69, respectively) [28], and Reurs et al. for the German version (0.77 and 0.72 vs. 0.43 and 0.26, respectively) [19], but not mentioned by Przydacz et al. for the Polish SF-Qualiveen (0.81 and 0.89 vs. 0.80 and 0.84, respectively) [21]. Regarding test–retest reliability, we found an ICC of 0.91 similar to those found in the SF-Qualiveen English (0.88) [15], German (0.90) [16], Russia (0.89) [28], and Polish (0.89) [21] version validation studies.

The association between SF-Qualiveen and NBSS scores in patients with MS has never been evaluated before. This association demonstrates the questionnaire’s external validity and its relationship to clinical symptoms. The NBSS is a frequently utilized evaluation tool in neuro-urology; nonetheless, it contains only one item about the QoL [7, 10]. The SF-Qualiveen assesses life satisfaction in terms of lower urinary tract dysfunction. These two instruments complement one another when used in combination.

This study has some limitations, firstly inability to evaluate the responsiveness of the SF-Qualiveen, but other investigations studies have already established this characteristic [14]. Secondly, all participants were recruited in four outpatient clinics from two Syrian provinces, but the participants in rural and distant locations may require a different approach. However, the questionnaire demonstrated good measurement characteristics in the original study and previous validation studies [18, 19, 21].

Conclusion

The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the SF-Qualiveen is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating urological dysfunction-related quality of life in the Arabic population with MS. Employing the SF-Qualiveen in their native language can help these patients and their physicians better comprehend bladder and urinary symptoms in regular practice. However, we need additional replication and validation of the results in greater, more varied populations. Future research should, therefore, concentrate on analyzing a large number of participants in the validation study and other psychometric features, like measurement invariance between groups with varied levels of education and health literacy.

Data availability

The data collected in this study are available from the corresponding author upon an adequate request.

References

  1. de Sèze M, Ruffion A, Denys P, Joseph P-A, Perrouin-Verbe B. The neurogenic bladder in multiple sclerosis: review of the literature and proposal of management guidelines., Mult. Scler, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 915–928, Aug. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458506075651.

  2. Solaro C et al. Aug., Prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: an Italian multicenter study (using the DYMUS questionnaire)., J. Neurol. Sci, vol. 331, no. 1–2, pp. 94–97, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.020.

  3. Kondo A, Kamihira O, Ozawa H. Neural tube defects: prevalence, etiology and prevention. Int J Urol off J Japanese Urol Assoc. Jan. 2009;16(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02163.x.

  4. Rothwell PM, McDowell Z, Wong CK, Dorman PJ. Doctors and patients don’t agree: cross sectional study of patients’ and doctors’ perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ. May 1997;314(7094):1580–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7094.1580.

  5. Groen J, et al. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-Urology. Eur Urol. Feb. 2016;69(2):324–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071.

  6. Clark R, Welk B. Patient reported outcome measures in neurogenic bladder. Transl Androl Urol. Feb. 2016;5(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.12.05.

  7. Welk B, Morrow SA, Madarasz W, Potter P, Sequeira K. The conceptualization and development of a patient-reported neurogenic bladder symptom score. Res Rep Urol. 2013;5:129–37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S51020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa P et al. Jan., Quality of life in spinal cord injury patients with urinary difficulties. Development and validation of qualiveen., Eur. Urol, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1159/000052421.

  9. Bonniaud V, Parratte B, Amarenco G, Jackowski D, Didier J-P, Guyatt G. Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with urinary disorders using the Qualiveen questionnaire., Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 1317–1323, Aug. 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.029.

  10. Welk B, Morrow S, Madarasz W, Baverstock R, Macnab J, Sequeira K. The validity and reliability of the neurogenic bladder symptom score. J Urol. Aug. 2014;192(2):452–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.027.

  11. Khadour YA, Ebrahem BM, Khadour FA. Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Arabic version of the short form of Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms Score., Neurourol. Urodyn, Apr. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25184.

  12. Bonniaud V et al. Mar., Quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with urinary disorders: discriminative validation of the English version of Qualiveen., Qual. life Res. an Int. J. Qual. life Asp. Treat. care Rehabil, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 425–431, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0686-1.

  13. Pannek J, Märk R, Stöhrer M, Schurch B. [Quality of life in German-speaking patients with spinal cord injuries and bladder dysfunctions. Validation of the German version of the Qualiveen questionnaire]., Urologe. A, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1416–1421, Oct. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-007-1425-3.

  14. Bonniaud V et al. Mar., Italian version of Qualiveen-30: cultural adaptation of a neurogenic urinary disorder-specific instrument., Neurourol. Urodyn, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 354–359, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20967.

  15. D’Ancona CAL, et al. Quality of life of neurogenic patients: translation and validation of the Portuguese version of Qualiveen. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9402-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciudin A et al. Apr., Quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients: translation and validation of the Spanish version of Qualiveen., Neurourol. Urodyn, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 517–520, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21234.

  17. Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Akkoc Y, Yesil H, Ekmekci O. Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis and urinary disorders: reliability and validity of turkish-language version of Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(1):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2009.08.0132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonniaud V, Bryant D, Parratte B, Guyatt G. Development and validation of the short form of a urinary quality of life questionnaire: SF-Qualiveen., J. Urol, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 2592–2598, Dec. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.016.

  19. Reuvers SHM, Korfage IJ, Scheepe JR, Blok BFM. The urinary-specific quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients: Dutch translation and validation of the SF-Qualiveen., Neurourol. Urodyn, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1629–1635, Aug. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23168.

  20. Konstantinidis C, Tzitzika M, Daoultzis KC, Samarinas M, Giannitsas K, Athanasopoulos A. Translation and cultural adaptation of SF Qualiveen questionnaire in Greek., Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 639–644, Aug. 2021, https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06558-2.

  21. Przydacz M, Kornelak P, Golabek T, Dudek P, Chlosta P. Polish versions of the Qualiveen and the SF-Qualiveen: Translation and validation of urinary disorder-specific instruments in patients with multiple sclerosis., Neurourol. Urodyn, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1764–1770, Aug. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24419.

  22. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. Apr. 2011;17(2):268–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.

  23. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures., Spine (Phila. Pa 1976)., vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 3186–3191, Dec. 2000, https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

  24. Mokkink LB et al. Jul., The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes., J. Clin. Epidemiol, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 737–745, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

  25. Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales., J. Psychosom. Res, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 319–323, Apr. 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006.

  26. George MP. D, SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 2003.

  27. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. May 2018;126(5):1763–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.

  28. Philippova ES, Bazhenov IV, Ziryanov AV, Moskvina EY. Evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction impact on quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: Russian translation and validation of SF-Qualiveen. Mult Scler Int. 2020;2020:p4652439. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4652439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to our all patients and their caregivers for accepting to participate in our study.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, 11835, Egypt

    Younes A. Khadour

  2. Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baath University, Homs, Syria

    Younes A. Khadour & Fater A. Khadour

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Meng Zheng

  4. Department of Physical Therapy, Health Science Faculty, Al-Baath University, Homs, Syria

    Fater A. Khadour

  5. Department of Rehabilitation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095#, Jie-Fang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China

    Fater A. Khadour

Authors
  1. Younes A. Khadour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meng Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fater A. Khadour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YAK wrote the initial draft of the manuscript providing language help, and critically revised the manuscript; MZ co-initiated the study and critically revised the manuscript providing language help and proofreading the article; FAK critically revised the manuscript and supervising all the course of the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fater A. Khadour.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects. The Ethical Committee approved this study in the Al Baath University Institutional Review Board Consent Letter – IRB 2023196-S. All our methods were carried out under relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and their legal guardian(s) (illiterate participants). We explained the purpose of the survey to each participant and the way to answer the questionnaire. It was all voluntary; no names were taken, so we provided anonymous data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Fater A. Khadour is the corresponding author and Younes A. Khadour is the first author of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khadour, Y.A., Zheng, M. & Khadour, F.A. Arabic version of the SF-Qualiveen: cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of urinary disorder‐specific instruments in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Urol 24, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01429-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01429-4

Keywords

BMC Urology

ISSN: 1471-2490

Contact us