Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Bennett |
26 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Günalp Uzun |
28 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniele Porru |
28 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Warren |
29 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tomoaki Tanaka |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Bennett |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Günalp Uzun |
16 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tomoaki Tanaka |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tomoaki Tanaka |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tomoaki Tanaka |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
13 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tomoaki Tanaka |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tomoaki Tanaka |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
24 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-11-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.