Peer Review reports
From: Overall and worst gleason scores are equally good predictors of prostate cancer progression
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Iczkowski |
26 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Allan |
19 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tapio Visakorpi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Iczkowski |
6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Allan |
23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tapio Visakorpi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tapio Visakorpi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
6 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-11-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.