Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Dmochowski |
30 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emilio Sacco |
1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Armstrong |
18 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Armstrong |
28 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
13 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
18 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
18 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
20 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
20 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-11-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.