Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of antimuscarinics in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in Spain: A decision-tree model

Original Submission
15 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Dmochowski
30 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emilio Sacco
1 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Armstrong
18 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Javier Rejas
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Javier Rejas
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Armstrong
28 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Javier Rejas
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Javier Rejas
Resubmission - Version 5
9 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Javier Rejas
Resubmission - Version 6
13 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
18 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Javier Rejas
Resubmission - Version 8
18 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
20 May 2011 Editorially accepted
20 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-11-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page