Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Dmochowski |
| 30 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emilio Sacco |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Armstrong |
| 18 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Armstrong |
| 28 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 18 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Javier Rejas |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 18 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-11-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.