From: Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis
Items | No. ofstudies | Reference of studies | Sample size | Tests forheterogeneity | Analysis model | Test for overalleffect | RR/WMD/SMD | Favor | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | TB/SD | I2 | Pa |  | Z | Pa | 95% CI |  |
Stone-free rate | 10 | 463/459 | 0% | 0.910 | Fixed | 0.32 | 0.747 | 0.992 [0.946,1.041] | SD | |
Operative time | 7 | 266/262 | 62.8% | 0.013 | Random | 1.98 | 0.048 | −3.436 [−6.837,-0.036] | TB | |
Hospital stay | 10 | 480/476 | 96.9% | <0.0001 | Random | 10.02 | <0.0001 | −1.435 [−1.716,-1.154] | TB | |
Return to normal activity | 7 | 385/381 | 97.5% | <0.0001 | Random | 5.44 | <0.0001 | −4.235 [−5.761,-2.709] | TB | |
Postoperative hemoglobin drop | 8 | 438/434 | 49.7% | 0.053 | Fixed | 1.37 | 0.169 | −0.018 [−0.043,0.008] | TB | |
Postoperative analgesic requirements | 8 | 405/401 | 91.4% | <0.0001 | Random | 4.79 | <0.0001 | −1.234 [−1.739,-0.729] | TB | |
Postoperative pain scores | 7 | 383/378 | 94.9% | <0.0001 | Random | 6.35 | <0.0001 | −15.787 [−20.660,-10.913] | TB | |
Blood transfusion | 7 | 226/226 | 0% | 0.768 | Fixed | 0.62 | 0.538 | 0.785 [0.364,1.696] | TB | |
Fever | 6 | 333/333 | 0% | 0.906 | Fixed | <0.001 | 0.999 | 1.001 [0.521,1.922] | SD | |
Urine leakage | 6 | 386/381 | 40.4% | 0.136 | Fixed | 3.64 | <0.0001 | 0.259[0.125,0.537] | TB |