Skip to main content

Table 4 Treatment Outcomes of the Mesh and Thermo-Expandable Stent Groups

From: Long-term outcomes of two types of metal stent for chronic benign ureteral strictures

 

Mesh (n = 25)

Thermo-expandable (n = 21)

Primary

Overall

Primary

Overall

Follow-up monthsa

41.4 ± 23.1

34.4 ± 16.5

Success rateb, n (%)

 First year (%)

13 (54.9)

18 (78.7)

14 (70.4)

15 (75.4)

 Second year (%)

4 (16.9)

10 (54.5)

11 (59.5)

12 (64.6)

 Third year (%)

4 (16.9)

9 (49.1)

4 (30.6)

7 (56.5)

 Time to 50% failure (month)

15.6

29.0

30.9

54.3

Cause of failure, n (%)

Patency-related failure

 Migration

4 (16.0)

4 (16.0)

2 (9.5)

1 (4.8)

 Hyperplasia

14 (56.0)

5 (20.0)

3 (14.3)

5 (23.8)

 Encrustation

1 (4.0)

2 (8.0)

9 (42.9)

3 (14.3)

Patency-unrelated failure

 Concomitant changec

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (4.8)

0 (0.0)

 Fistula

2 (8.0)

3 (12.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 Pseudoaneurysm

1 (4.0)

1 (4.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

  1. aFollow-up months for the two groups were comparable (p = 0.250)
  2. bSuccess rate is an estimate, and the standard error is omitted. Neither the primary nor the overall rates were statistically significant (p = 0.204, 0.586)
  3. cConcomitant change refers to the exchange of one obstructed stent as well as the other unobstructed stent due to concerns over future obstruction