Peer Review reports
From: Can serum procalcitonin levels be useful in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 May 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tarik Emre Sener |
29 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Onur Dede |
19 Sep 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Nusret Can Çilesiz |
8 Oct 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tarik Emre Sener |
3 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eu Chang Hwang |
3 Dec 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Nusret Can Çilesiz |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Jan 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Nusret Can Çilesiz |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Jan 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tarik Emre Sener |
18 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bilal Eryildirim |
21 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Nusret Can Çilesiz |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bilal Eryildirim |
25 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Nusret Can Çilesiz |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Nusret Can Çilesiz |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
2 Apr 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Apr 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12894-020-00608-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.