Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison in terms of URS treatment

From: Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm

 

Group 1

Group 2

p value

Impacted ureteral stones fund during URS, n (%)

79 (49.4)

30 (16.7)

< 0.05

Energy used for gravel, KJ, mean (SD)

1.459 (0.546)

1.545 (0.606)

0.203

Operation time, minutes, mean (SD)

41.38 (11.39)

36.43 (13.36)

0.01

Using stone baskets, n (%)

113 (70.6)

97 (53.9)

0.001

SFR of URS, n (%)

   

After first URS session

107 (66.9)

148 (82.2)

0.001

After second URS session

132 (82.5)

160 (88.9)

0.084

Hospitalization times, days, mean (SD)

2.7 (1.2)

1.69 (1.1)

0.02

  1. URS ureteroscopy, SFR stone-free rate