Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison in terms of URS treatment

From: Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm

  Group 1 Group 2 p value
Impacted ureteral stones fund during URS, n (%) 79 (49.4) 30 (16.7) < 0.05
Energy used for gravel, KJ, mean (SD) 1.459 (0.546) 1.545 (0.606) 0.203
Operation time, minutes, mean (SD) 41.38 (11.39) 36.43 (13.36) 0.01
Using stone baskets, n (%) 113 (70.6) 97 (53.9) 0.001
SFR of URS, n (%)    
After first URS session 107 (66.9) 148 (82.2) 0.001
After second URS session 132 (82.5) 160 (88.9) 0.084
Hospitalization times, days, mean (SD) 2.7 (1.2) 1.69 (1.1) 0.02
  1. URS ureteroscopy, SFR stone-free rate