Peer Review reports
From: The utilization of perfused cadaver simulation in urologic training: a pilot study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 May 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 May 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 May 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 19 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 1 Jul 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 1 Aug 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Aug 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Aug 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 28 Aug 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 29 Aug 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 3 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 8 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel McClelland |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Sep 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Sep 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12894-021-00895-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.