Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No

Author

Year

Experimental group

Control group

Study design

Quality assessment

Number (n)

Age (Mean ± SD)

Male (n)

Stone

Access sheath and lithotripsy energy

Number (n)

Age (Mean ± SD)

Male (n)

Stone size

Access sheath and lithotripsy energy

1

Huang

2016

91

43.5 ± 2.9

53

Stone dimension 16.7 ± 5.8 mm

16F vacuum sheath/holmium laser

91

44.1 ± 3.2

51

15.1 ± 6.3 mm

16F peel-away sheath/holmium laser

RCT

3a

2

Du

2018

311

43.6 ± 17.4

187

Stone size 13.6 ± 5.2 cm2

16-18F vacuum sheath/ultrasound

304

41.2 ± 16.9

181

13.9 ± 4.7 cm2

16-18F peel-away sheath/ultrasound

RCT

2a

3

Xu

2020

30

52.1 ± 11.5

18

Stone diameter 4.2 ± 1.0 cm

20F vacuum sheath/pneumatic and holmium laser

30

51.8 ± 9.6

14

3.8 ± 1.4 cm

20F conventional sheath/pneumatic and holmium laser

RCT

4a

  1. aJadad score