Peer Review reports
From: A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Shelby Rauh |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Aug 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Shelby Rauh |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Aug 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Oct 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 22 Dec 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 9 Mar 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Shelby Rauh |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 21 Jan 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 28 Jan 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 4 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 22 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Shelby Rauh |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 22 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 26 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Shelby Rauh |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 26 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jul 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Jul 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12894-022-01059-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.