Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention

Original Submission
15 Dec 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugenie Johnson
27 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kim Bundvig Barken
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugenie Johnson
20 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kim Bundvig Barken
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kim Bundvig Barken
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugenie Johnson
12 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kim Bundvig Barken
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kim Bundvig Barken
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
5 Sep 2022 Editorially accepted
19 Sep 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12894-022-01102-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page