Skip to main content

Table 5 The comparison of complication (Clavien-Dindo grade) and estimated OR for Grade II-IV.

From: High stone-free rate immediately after suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with Intelligent pressure-control in treating upper urinary tract calculi

Variables

Clavien-Dindo grade

p-value

Multivariate analysis

Grade I (n = 300)

Grade II-IV (n = 10)

aOR (95%CI)

Demography

Age

50 (40.00–59.00)

44.5 (39.00–58.00)

0.603

Gender

    

 Male

193 (97.97)

4 (2.03)

0.179

 Female

107 (94.69)

6 (5.31)

  

 BMI

24.79 (22.85–26.82)

26.22 (23.88–27.28)

0.259

Stent in ureter

  

1.000a

 Yes

54 (98.18)

1 (1.82)

  

 No

246 (96.47)

9 (3.53)

  

Infection

  

0.701a

 Yes

232 (97.07)

7 (2.93)

  

 No

68 (95.77)

3 (4.23)

  

Disease history

Stone

  

0.738a

 Yes

101 (96.19)

4 (3.81)

  

 No

199 (97.07)

6 (2.93)

  

Other kidney diseases

  

1.000a

 Yes

19 (100.00)

0 (0.00)

  

 No

281 (96.56)

10 (3.44)

  

DM

  

0.190a

 Yes

45 (93.75)

3 (6.25)

  

 No

255 (97.33)

7 (2.67)

  

Hypertension

  

0.110a

 Yes

81 (94.19)

5 (5.81)

  

 No

219 (97.77)

5 (2.23)

  

Medicine user and weakness

  

0.301a

 Yes

32 (94.12)

2 (5.88)

  

 No

268 (97.1)

8 (2.9)

  

Operation

Operation time

75 (60.0–109.5)

82.5 (40.0–185.0)

0.768

Stone number

  

0.002 a

 

 Single

142 (100.00)

0 (0.00)

 

 Multiple

158 (94.05)

10 (5.95)

 

Stone size (mm)

  

0.028 a

 

 < 20

139 (97.89)

3 (2.11)

 

1

 20–29

92 (98.92)

1 (1.08)

 

0.32 (0.03, 3.44)

 30–39

34 (94.44)

2 (5.56)

 

1.02 (0.15, 7.19)

 40–49

16 (94.12)

1 (5.88)

 

0.73 (0.06, 8.64)

 ≥ 50

19 (86.36)

3 (13.64)

 

1.75 (0.25, 12.35)

Composition

  

0.278a

 

 Calcium oxalate

67 (95.71)

3 (4.29)

 

 Calcium phosphate

21 (91.30)

2 (8.70)

 

 Uric acid and magnesium ammonium phosphate

12 (100.00)

0 (0.00)

 

Complex

200 (97.56)

5 (2.44)

 

Hydronephrosis

  

0.772 a

 

 Grade 0

45 (95.74)

2 (4.26)

 

 Grade I

115 (95.83)

5 (4.17)

 

 Grade II

102 (97.14)

3 (2.86)

 

 Grade III

35 (100.00)

0 (0.00)

 

 Grade VI

3 (100.00)

0 (0.00)

 

CT value (ml)

  

0.494 a

 

 ≤ 1000

211 (97.24)

6 (2.76)

 

 > 1000

89 (95.70)

4 (4.30)

 

Guy’s stone score

  

0.002 a

 

 Grade I

168 (99.41)

1 (0.59)

 

1

 Grade II

109 (95.61)

5 (4.39)

 

8.11 (0.79, 82.96)

 Grade III

17 (85.00)

3 (15.00)

 

22.36 (1.81, 276.36)

 Grade VI

6 (85.71)

1 (14.29)

 

15.90 (0.55, 456.26)

  1. The significance of bold values were p < 0.05
  2. aOR adjusted Odds ratio, BMI body mass index, DM diabetes mellitus, CT computer tomography
  3. Continuous data without normal distribution are presented as median (interquartile) and performed by Wilcoxon rank; Categorical data are presented as n (%) and performed by the Chi-squared test or aFisher’s exact test, as appropriate