Skip to main content

Table 2 The methodological quality of the included studies (n = 13) on high-pressure balloon dilatation of primary obstructive megaureters

From: High-pressure balloon dilatation of primary obstructive megaureter in children: a systematic review

Study

Reporting

External validity

Internal validity bias

Internal validity confounding

Power

Total scores

Mean

Destro et al. [16]

8/7

3/3

4/4

1/0

0/0

16/14

15

García-Aparicio et al. [18]

8/6

3/3

4/3

1/0

0/0

16/12

14

Christman et al. [15]

7/6

3/3

3/3

1/0

0/0

14/12

13

Casal Beloy et al. [13]

8/8

3/3

3/2

0/0

0/0

14/13

13.5

Torino et al. [22]

9/7

3/3

4/2

1/0

0/0

17/12

14.5

Kassite et al. [19]

8/8

3/3

4/4

1/0

0/0

16/15

15.5

Romero et al. [21]

9/9

3/3

4/3

1/0

0/0

17/15

16

Angerri et al. [10]

8/5

3/3

3/2

1/0

0/0

15/10

12.5

Ortiz et al. [20]

8/8

3/3

4/3

1/1

0/0

16/15

15.5

Capozza et al. [12]

9/6

3/3

4/3

1/0

0/0

17/12

14.5

Faraj et al. [17]

9/9

3/3

4/3

1/0

0/0

17/15

16

Chiarenza et al. [14]

8/3

3/3

3/1

1/0

0/0

15/7

11

Bujons et al. [11]

9/8

3/3

4/3

1/0

0/0

17/14

15.5

  1. The kappa value for the inter-observer agreement of the quality assessment was 0.8755