Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with prostate volume of 30–80 ml

From: Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement

  

B-TUVP

HoLEP

P value *

All patients

 

N=75

 N=166

 

Age(years-old)

 

76.4 ± 6.8

71.5 ± 7.4

<0.001

Prostate volume (ml)

 

57.3 ± 14.8

56.0 ± 14.2

0.5

Operative time (mins)

 

93.7 ± 22.8

125.3 ± 36.7

<0.001

Duration of post-operative catheterisation (days)

 

2.6 ± 1.1

2.3 ± 1.9

0.3

Hospital stay period after operation (days)

 

5.9 ± 2.4

6.7 ± 2.5

0.018

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

Change (%)

96.0 ± 1.4

90.4 ± 5.7

<0.001

Necessity of 2nd procedure

 

2 (2.7%)

0

0.034

Uncatheterised patients

 

N = 45

 N = 135

 

Total IPSS

Pre

22.3 ± 7.2

22.1 ± 7.2

0.9

 

1POM

13.3 ± 7.9

9.3 ± 6.3

0.004

 

Change (%) at 1POM

69.3 ± 43.3

45.1 ± 32.7

0.008

 

3POM

9.8 ± 7.4

6.7 ± 5.2

0.018

 

Change (%) at 3POM

46.0 ± 34.8

36.3 ± 39.2

0.1

IPSS-QoL

Pre

5.2 ± 1.0

4.8 ± 1.1

0.09

 

1POM

3.5 ± 1.8

3.0 ± 1.6

0.1

 

Change (%) at 1POM

69.1 ± 39.9

68.6 ± 53.3

0.7

 

3POM

2.6 ± 1.7

2.1 ± 1.5

0.1

 

Change (%) at 3POM

53.0 ± 32.9

37.1 ± 30.0

0.06

Catheterised patients

 

N = 30

 N = 31

 

Achieving catheter free status after surgery

 

20 (67%)

27 (87%)

0.06

  1. *Compared between B-TUVP and HoLEP.
  2. Values were presented as mean ± SD or number of cases (%).
  3. Hb change (%) was calculated by (Hb at 1POD / preoperative Hb)x100.
  4. IPSS change (%) and IPSS-QoL change(%) were calculated by (values at 1 or 3POM / preoperative values) x 100.