Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with prostate volume > 80 ml

From: Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement

  

B-TUVP

HoLEP

P value *

All patients

 

N=82

 N=115

 

Age(years-old)

 

74.4 ± 7.5

73.0 ± 6.6

0.1

Prostate volume (ml)

 

119.4 ± 44.9

111.2 ± 29.8

0.1

Operative time (mins)

 

120.28 ± 31.0

164.6 ± 43.0

<0.001

Duration of post-operative catheterisation (days)

 

3.0 ± 1.4

2.5 ± 1.2

0.009

Hospital stay period after operation (days)

 

6.8 ± 2.7

7.0 ± 2.8

0.2

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

Change (%)

96.0 ± 6.5

84 ± 10.6

<0.001

Necessity of 2nd procedure

 

8 (9.8%)

3 (2.6%)

0.03

Uncatheterised patients

 

N = 48

 N = 76

 

Total IPSS

Pre

20.3 ± 8.6

22.3 ± 8.4

0.295

 

1POM

13.8 ± 8.2

8.8 ± 6.2

0.001

 

Change (%) at 1POM

86.0 ± 63.9

50.4 ± 64.2

< 0.001

 

3POM

10.6 ± 8.0

6.0 ± 5.0

0.002

 

Change (%) at 3POM

62.2 ± 42.0

27.0 ± 20.0

< 0.001

IPSS-QoL

Pre

4.9 ± 1.1

4.7 ± 1.3

0.581

 

1POM

3.7 ± 1.7

2.5 ± 1.8

0.005

 

Change (%) at 1POM

78.5 ± 33.0

58.5 ± 72.2

0.005

 

3POM

2.9 ± 1.8

1.7 ± 1.5

0.002

 

Change (%) at 3POM

63.3 ± 39.0

30.7 ± 30.8

0.001

Catheterised patients

 

N = 34

 N = 39

 

Achieving catheter free status after surgery

 

24 (71%)

39 (100%)

<0.001

  1. * Compared between B-TUVP and HoLEP.
  2. Values were presented as mean ± SD or Number of cases (%).
  3. Hb change (%) was calculated by (Hb at 1POD / preoperative Hb)x100.
  4. IPSS change (%) and IPSS-QoL change(%) were calculated by (values at 1 or 3POM / preoperative values) x 100.