Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of studies

From: Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis

Study

Country

Design

Therapy in the experimental group

Therapy in the control group

Sample size:

experiment/control

Stone size:

experiment/control, mm

Location of stone

       

Proximal

ureter

Mid-to-distal

ureter

Bucci 2018 [11]

Italy

RCT

ESWL within 12 h

dESWL

36/34

9.03/10.68

25

45

Choi

2012 [9]

Korea

R

ESWL within 48 h

dESWL

153/126

7.6 ± 2.5/8.3 ± 3.1

183

96

Cornelius 2020 [12]

Italy

R

ESWL within 48 h

dESWL

52/52

7.1 ± 1.9/7.2 ± 1.9

80

24

Joshi 1999 [13]

UK

R

ESWL within 48 h

dESWL

16/40

8.2/9.3

37

19

Kravchick 2005 [7]

Israel

RCT

ESWL within 48 to 72 h

dESWL

25/28

7.4 ± 2.4/6.9 ± 2.4

53

NA

Kumar 2010 [14]

India

RCT

ESWL within 48 h

dESWL

80/80

7.3 ± 1.5/7.5 ± 1.7

160

NA

Seitz 2005 [15]

Austria

R

ESWL within 48 h

dESWL

44/47

8.0 ± 2.4/8.1 ± 2.1

91

NA

Tombal 2005 [8]

Belgium

RCT

ESWL within 6 h

dESWL

50/50

6.38/4.8

46

54

Uguz 2012 [16]

Turkey

RCT

ESWL within 24 h

dESWL

32/31

8.1 ± 3.2/8.8 ± 2.9

41

22

  1. RCT: Randomised controlled trial, R: Retrospectively study, NA: not available, ESWL: emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, dESWL: delayed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy