Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Urethral advancement and glanuloplasty versus tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair: a prospective randomized study

Original Submission
13 Nov 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Sakr
20 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Basem A. Fathi
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Basem A. Fathi
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Sakr
17 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Basem A. Fathi
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
21 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Basem A. Fathi
Resubmission - Version 8
21 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
23 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Basem A. Fathi
Resubmission - Version 9
23 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
24 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Basem A. Fathi
Resubmission - Version 10
24 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
11 Apr 2023 Editorially accepted
28 Apr 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12894-023-01242-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page