Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of studied parameters according to the operation type

From: Urethral advancement and glanuloplasty versus tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair: a prospective randomized study

 

urethral advancement and glanuloplasty technique

TIP urethroplasty

p

Coronal or subcoronal

Glandular

p

No complications

Complications

p

n = 25 (50%)

n = 25 (50%)

n = 26 (52%)

n = 24 (48%)

n = 36

(72%)

n = 14

(28%)

Age (years)

mean ± SD

4.7 ± 2.7

3.8 ± 2.4

0.228

3.8 ± 1.2

4.7 ± 1.2

0.240

4.2 ± 1.4

4.2 ± 1.1

0.959

Coronal or subcoronal

N,%

11(44%)

15(60%)

0.258

-

-

-

19(52.8%)

7(50%)

0.860

Glandular

N,%

14(56%)

10(40%)

-

-

-

17(47.2%)

7(50%)

duration of operation (minutes)

mean ± SD

55.6 ± 7.5

53.8 ± 6.8

0.279

55.2 ± 7

54.2 ± 7.5

0.618

54.9 ± 7.6

54.3 ± 6.2

0.802

Postoperative pain

N,%

9(36%)

6(24%)

0.355

6(23.1%)

9(37.5%)

0.266

7(19.4%)

8(57.1%)

0.016

Postoperative hospital stay (days)

median, minimum-maximum

2(1–3)

2(1–3)

0.550

2(1–3)

2(1–3)

0.352

2(1–3)

2(1–3)

0.118

Postoperative complications

Any

N,%

8(32%)

6(24%)

0.529

7(26.9%)

7(29.2%)

0.860

-

-

-

meatal stenosis

N,%

2(25%)

3(50%)

0.580

3(42.9%)

2(28.6%)

0.577

-

-

-

meatal retraction

N,%

3(37.5%)

1(16.7%)

0.580

0(0%)

4(57.1%)

0.070

-

-

-

fistula

N,%

2(25%)

2(33.3%)

0.733

3(42.9%)

1(14.3%)

0.559

-

-

-

Glans dehiscence

N,%

1(12.5%)

0(0%)

0.369

1(14.3%)

0(0%)

0.299s

-

-

-