Peer Review reports
From: Can pelvic diameter measurement have an effect on surgical outcomes in radical cystectomy?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jan 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 27 Mar 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 11 Apr 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesk Mulita |
| 3 May 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Erdik |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 May 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 5 May 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Erdik |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 5 May 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 8 May 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Erdik |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 8 May 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 9 May 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesk Mulita |
| 16 May 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 May 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jun 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12894-023-01277-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.