Peer Review reports
From: Workflow efficiencies for flexible cystoscopy: comparing single-use vs reusable cystoscopes
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 May 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Nov 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohamed Omar |
| 9 Jan 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Haislip |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Jan 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Jan 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Haislip |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Jan 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Jan 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohamed Omar |
| 18 Jan 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 9 Feb 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Haislip |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Feb 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 15 Feb 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Haislip |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 Feb 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 20 Feb 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Feb 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Mar 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12894-024-01436-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.