Skip to main content

Table 1 The clinical and pathological characteristics of ungrouped, and grouped patients before or after PSM

From: Serum α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase as a biomarker for predicting survival outcomes in patients with UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy

Variables

Total patients (n = 544)

Before PSM

After PSMa

α-HBDH-low group (n = 394)

α-HBDH-high group (n = 150)

P value

α-HBDH-low group (n = 300)

α-HBDH-high group (n = 150)

P value

Age (IQR)

68.00 (61.00–75.00)

68.00 (61.00–75.00)

69.00 (64.00–75.00)

0.623

68.00 (61.00–75.00)

69.00 (64.00–75.00)

0.623

Age, n (%)

   

0.052

  

0.079

 < 65

191 (35.11%)

148 (37.56%)

43 (28.67%)

 

111 (37.00%)

43 (28.67%)

 

  ≥ 65

353 (64.89%)

246 (62.44%)

107 (71.33%)

 

189 (63.00%)

107 (71.33%)

 

Body mass index (IQR)

22.67 (20.76–25.35)

22.66 (20.77–25.43)

22.76 (19.90–24.35)

0.490

22.66 (20.77–25.43)

22.70 (19.90–24.35)

0.710

α-HBDH (IQR)

139.50 (122.75–161.00)

131.00 (119.00–142.00)

175.50 (164.25–203.50)

 < 0.001

133.00 (119.80–143.00)

175.50 (164.20–203.50)

 < 0.001

LDH (IQR)

179.00 (157.75–202.00)

168.00 (151.00–182.00)

222.50 (205.00–251.75)

 < 0.001

169.00 (150.80–182.20)

222.50 (205.00–251.80)

 

LDH, n (%)

   

 < 0.001

  

 < 0.001

  ≤ 200

401 (73.71%)

372 (94.42%)

29 (19.33%)

 

286 (95.33%)

29 (19.33%)

 

  > 200

143 (26.29)

22 (5.58%)

121 (80.67%)

 

14 (4.67%)

121 (80.67%)

 

Albumin (IQR)

40.55 (37.00–43.10)

40.80 (37.80–43.30)

39.60 (35.00–43.00)

0.025

40.20 (38.20–43.20)

39.60 (35.00–43.00)

0.058

Gender, n (%)

   

 < 0.001

  

0.124

 Female

241 (44.30%)

153 (38.83%)

88 (58.67%)

 

153 (51.00%)

88 (58.67%)

 

 Male

303 (55.70%)

241 (61.17%)

62 (41.33%)

 

147 (49.00%)

62 (41.43%)

 

Tumor location, n (%)

   

0.007

  

0.514

 Renal pelvis

271 (49.91%)

190 (48.35%)

81 (54.00%)

 

170 (56.67%)

81 (54.00%)

 

 Ureter

209 (38.49%)

165 (41.98%)

44 (29.33%)

 

92 (30.67%)

44 (29.33%)

 

 Both

63 (11.60%)

38 (9.67%)

25 (16.67%)

 

38 (12.67%)

25 (16.67%)

 

Tumor size, n (%)

   

0.392

  

0.325

  < 3

186 (34.38%)

139 (35.46%)

47 (31.54%)

 

108 (36.24%)

47 (31.54%)

 

  ≥ 3

355 (65.62%)

253 (64.54%)

102 (68.46%)

 

190 (63.76%)

102 (68.46%)

 

Tumor stage, n (%)

   

0.128

  

0.461

  ≤ pT2

272 (50.28%)

205 (52.30%)

67 (44.97%)

 

145 (48.66%)

67 (44.97%)

 

  > pT2

269 (49.72%)

187 (47.70%)

82 (55.03%)

 

153 (51.34%)

82 (55.03%)

 

Tumor grade, n (%)

   

0.052

  

0.354

 Low

129 (23.89%)

102 (26.09%)

27 (18.12%)

 

65 (21.89%)

27 (18.12%)

 

 High

411 (76.11%)

289 (73.91%)

122 (81.88%)

 

232 (78.11%)

122 (81.88%)

 

Lymph node status, n (%)

   

0.005

  

0.084

 pN0/x

487 (89.85%)

362 (92.11%)

125 (83.89%)

 

269 (89.67%)

126 (84.00%)

 

 pN + 

55 (10.15%)

31 (7.89%)

24 (16.11%)

 

31 (10.33%)

24 (16.00%)

 

Lymphovascular invasion, n (%)

   

0.065

  

0.156

 Yes

87 (16.08%)

56 (14.29%)

31 (20.81%)

 

46 (15.44%)

31 (20.81%)

 

 No

454 (83.92%)

336 (85.71%)

118 (79.19%)

 

252 (84.56%)

118 (79.19%)

 

Tumor architecture, n (%)

   

0.290

  

0.584

 Sessile

246 (45.81%)

185 (47.19%)

61 (42.07%)

 

134 (44.82%)

61 (42.07%)

 

 Papillary

291 (54.19%)

207 (52.81%)

84 (57.93%)

 

165 (55.18%)

84 (57.93%)

 

Surgery margin, n (%)

   

0.139

  

0.077

 Positive

43 (7.95%)

27 (6.89%)

16 (10.74%)

 

18 (6.04%)

16 (10.74%)

 

 Negative

498 (92.05%)

365 (93.11%)

133 (89.26%)

 

280 (94.96%)

133 (89.26%)

 

Tumor necrosis, n (%)

   

0.891

  

0.487

 Yes

92 (16.91%)

67 (17.01%)

25 (16.67%)

 

42 (14.00%)

25 (16.67%)

 

 No

452 (83.09%)

327 (82.99%)

125 (83.33%)

 

258 (86.00%)

125 (83.33%)

 

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, n (%)

   

0.265

  

0.708

 Yes

84 (14.14%)

55 (14.00%)

29 (19.32%)

 

45 (15.00%)

29 (19.32%)

 

 No

460 (85.86%)

339 (86.00%)

121 (80.68%)

 

255 (85.00%)

121 (80.68%)

 
  1. Abbreviations: IQR Interquartile range, α-HBDH α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, LDH Lactate dehydrogenase, PSM Propensity score matching
  2. aPropensity score matching was used according to tumor location, gender and lymph node status, with one-to-two pair matching to balance differences caused by potential confounders