Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the entire cohort of participants as segregated according to the type of LND

From: Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic prostatectomy: antegrade versus retrograde technique

 

ePLND during RARP

 
 

Antegrade

Retrograde

p value*

No. Patients

41

64

 

Age (years)

67 (IQR 62–72.5)

70 (IQR 64–72)

0.27

BMI (kg/m2)

25.95 (IQR 24.22–29.76)

25.45 (IQR 23.53–28.36)

0.45

ASA

  

0.34

I

15 (36.6%)

29 (45.3%)

 

II

23 (56.1%)

32 (50.0%)

 

III

3 (7.3%)

3 (4.7%)

 

Previous abd. surgery

  

0.22

Yes

23 (56.1%)

28 (43.8%)

 

No

18 (43.9%)

36 (56.3%)

 

Clinical Stage

cT1

20 (48.8%)

30 (46.9%)

0.78

cT2

21 (51.2%)

32 (50.0%)

0.78

cN1

1 (2.4%)

4 (6.3%)

0.37

iPSA

7.35 (IQR 5.12–10.35)

6.95 (IQR 4.92–10)

0.97

ISUP grade

  

0.99

1

4 (9.8%)

6 (9.4%)

 

2–3

24 (58.5%)

42 (65.6%)

 

4–5

13 (31.7%)

16 (25%)

 

Pathological stage

  

0.31

pT2b-pT2c

28 (68.3%)

40 (62.5%)

 

pT3a

6 (14.6%)

11 (17.2%)

 

pT3b

4 (9.7%)

5 (7.8%)

 

Lymph nodes

Total number

20 (IQR 16.25–31.5)

19 (IQR 15–26.25)

0.18

Positive lymph nodes

5/41 (12.2%)

8/64 (12.5%)

0.96

Total OT (min)

290 (IQR 262–305)

326 (IQR 301.25–347.5)

 < 0.001

ePLND time (min)

33.5 (IQR 29.5–38.5)

33.5 (IQR 26.5–37.5)

0.40

EBL (ml)

300 (IQR 195–417.5)

323 (IQR 200–483)

0.25

Length of stay (days)

2.50 (IQR 2–3)

2.50 (IQR 2–3)

0.93

Catheterisation (days)

7 (IQR 6–9)

7 (IQR 6–7.75)

0.71

Abdominal drain (days)

1 (IQR 1–1)

1 (IQR 1–1)

0.56

Complications

  

0.61

Yes

8 (19.5%)

9 (14.1%)

 

No

33 (80.5%)

55 (85.9%)

 

Clavien-Dindo

  

0.40

I-II

6 (14.6%)

9 (14%)

 

III-IV

2 (4.9%)

0 (0%)

 

Lymphocele

  

0.30

Yes

3 (7.3%)

1 (1.6%)

 

No

38 (92.7%)

63 (98.4%)

 

Fever

  

0.51

Yes

5 (12.2%)

5 (7.8%)

 

No

36 (87.8%)

59 (92.2%)

 

LND quality

Efficient

33 (80.5%)

28 (44%)

0.01

Not efficient

8 (19.5%)

36 (56%)

 
  1. Keys: ePLND  extended pelvic lymph node dissection, RARP  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, BMI   Body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologist classification, EBL Estimated blood loss
  2. *p value according to the Mann–Whitney U test and the Fisher exact test, as indicated